Hi! This patch updates the gnutls package to v2.4.0. It also enables
PSK+SRP. Before the psktool was shipped in openwrt, but PSK was
disabled in the library which seemed rather pointless. Also, I think
PSK/SRP can be useful features on openwrt boxes, so it makes sense to
enable it. Further, LZ
Hi All,
how you should know, I'm working to port OpenWRT on m68k/coldfire arch.
I compiled with success (and some patch) the toolchain... but I have
this error during the kernel build:
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/devel/openwrt/OpenWRT.git/build_dir/linux-cf547x/linux-2.6.23'
make[5]: Enteri
Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> how you should know, I'm working to port OpenWRT on m68k/coldfire arch.
> I compiled with success (and some patch) the toolchain... but I have
> this error during the kernel build:
We had similar issues with mips in the past. If you look through the mi
Ooops, Sorry for the confusion... The patch (ehci-ssb support) wasn't
applied correctly in my distribution. I had to apply the patch manually.
Something wrong happens applying this patch (wl500gp-v2):
//ping message/
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From 192.168.1.15
Hi Felix
Hi All,
I found this article: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45882
the patch seems to solve the issue (that is manifested only using
gcc4.3).
luigi
On gio, 2008-06-19 at 16:21 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > how you should k
Dear devs,
on Fri Jun 13 21:57:24 CEST 2008, Conrad Hirano wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't mean to offend or insult you and the other developers.
> I realize you all have lives and are busy, and I sincerely appreciate
> the time and effort you have all spent in developing OpenWRT. It's
> just a bit
Felipe Maya wrote:
> Ooops, Sorry for the confusion... The patch (ehci-ssb support) wasn't
> applied correctly in my distribution. I had to apply the patch manually.
>
> Something wrong happens applying this patch (wl500gp-v2):
>
> //ping message/
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) byt
BTW, sorry for posting to the wrong thread. I need to switch to a different
mail agent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hu guys,
Finally I ported OpenWRT on coldfire/m68k with gcc4.3. I created a set
of patches (~3MBytes) to add:
- gcc4.3.1 support (need to compile coldfire code);
- m68k fixes for gcc4.3 and uClibc;
- kernel patch from Freescale for 547x/548x cpu and linux kernel
2.6.23;
- coldfire MCF54x5yFE
So I'm looking at the "model" of my firmware's root filesystem in
build_dir/mipsel/root-brcm47xx and I'm looking specifically
at /etc/config. I notice there is no /etc/config/network. I fear that
means my flashed firmware is not going to configure a network interface
when it comes up. Is this so
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 20:26 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> If yes, any idea why /etc/config/network is not being included in my
> firmware image?
NM. I just found /etc/init.d/netconfig. :-)
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
