> "Johannes" == Johannes Ballé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Johannes> On Monday 23 June 2008 12:23:45 Acinonyx wrote:
>> This surely helps the developers keep track of the submitted
>> patches but I think it makes it more time consuming to apply them
>> than emailed patches.
Johanne
On Monday 23 June 2008 12:23:45 Acinonyx wrote:
> > From my perspective, using the ticket system would be best. Then I could
> > submit my patch and forget about it afterwards, because I would be
> > notified by mail when someone made changes to the ticket.
>
> This surely helps the developers keep
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 01:23:45PM +0300, Acinonyx wrote:
> Monday 23 June 2008 12:19:44 ??/?? Johannes Ball?? :
> > From my perspective, using the ticket system would be best. Then I could
> > submit my patch and forget about it afterwards, because I would be notified
> > by m
Στις Monday 23 June 2008 12:19:44 ο/η Johannes Ballé έγραψε:
> From my perspective, using the ticket system would be best. Then I could
> submit my patch and forget about it afterwards, because I would be notified
> by mail when someone made changes to the ticket.
>
This surely helps the developer
Just a thought -
How-about moving to the Ubuntu Launchpad
Obviously there is a bit of work up front to migrate - but the patch/bug
tracing capabilities are pretty good - lots of visibility and a mature
process behind it
-
Chris Martin
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m: +61(0
On Sunday 22 June 2008 00:06:47 RB wrote:
> 1. Non-developers submitting patches would be required to
> additionally submit a ticket for its inclusion; this gets greater
> visibility but somewhat sidesteps the whole community review bit that
> emailing the list has.
>
> 2. One of the developers c
This patch adds error checking on the gpio number argument (strtoul instead of
atoi) and
on the ioctl return - to find mismatches between the GPIO number and the GPIO
mask inside the
kernel's gpio_dev driver.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: package/gpioctl/src/main.c
