On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to waste
> > space.
>
> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kernel emulated
> floating point operation results in an exception and the appropriate
> handling (fpu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Malte.
> There's no reason why the unified format couldn't be a tgz (or some other,
> maybe uncompressed, format which carries a magic number) with some meta
> informations :) Daniel's proposal sounded quite complicated to me.
So I finally took
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:08:17 +0200
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> My plan for the unified format is to keep the on-flash format the same
> as the input format. In the long run, I don't want any unpacking to be
> done in sysupgrade or the web interface. The structure is roughly
> like this: [second stage
2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to waste
>> > space.
>>
>> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kernel emulated
>> floating point operation results in an exception an
On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> >> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to
> >> > waste space.
> >>
> >> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kern
2009/6/21 Michael Buesch :
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
>> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> >> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to
>> >> > waste space.
>> >>
>> >> I would be very s
