On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:35 +0100, openwrt-comm...@openwrt.org wrote:
> Author: hauke
> Date: 2010-12-16 20:35:59 +0100 (Thu, 16 Dec 2010)
> New Revision: 24626
>
> Modified:
>trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/config-2.6.34
>trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/config-2.6.36
>trunk/target/linux/brcm
Enable v4l2 (and other) "input devices" that were previously disabled to
support capture directly from UVC-style cameras. There is no way
to re-enable individual "input devices" after a "--disable-devices" argument
is supplied to ./configure as is done with decoders, encoders, muxers,
parsers, and
Enable v4l2 (and other) "input devices" that were previously disabled to
support capture directly from UVC-style cameras. There is no way
to re-enable individual "input devices" after a "--disable-devices" argument
is supplied to ./configure as is done with decoders, encoders, muxers,
parsers, and
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:50:40PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> 3) adding serial flash support (already there in brcm-2.4, needs to be
> forward ported)
> 4) adding support for the new gigabit ethernet core
> 5) adding support for the gigabit switch
Without being able to help very much (I'm n
On 16 December 2010 18:09, Ryan Bair wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to flash the wrt610n v2 from trunk? Can anyone
> let me know what the current status of the 4716 (and the wrt610n v2
> specifically) is and what next steps are?
Currently there is no support in OpenWrt, but Bernhard Loos posted
so
I've been pinging back and forth between a ath5k x86 system and an ath9k
MIPS OpenWRT system.
One of the things that has been ellusive is the ability to set the
actual frequency bandwidth the Atheros
chips use, to something less than 20 MHz.
In the most recent development snapshots for ath5k th
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek
---
utils/triggerhappy/Makefile |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils/triggerhappy/Makefile b/utils/triggerhappy/Makefile
index b9569fd..58b83b3 100644
--- a/utils/triggerhappy/Makefile
+++ b/utils/triggerhappy/Makefile
@@
Hi all,
I have a bit of time off between now and the end of the year and a
new-to-me WRT610n v2 sitting in the box.
>From what I can tell, the majority of the hardware is the same between
the newly supported v1 and the unsupported v2 with the very notable
exception of the bcm4716 soc. It also see
