Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH-v6]samba 3.0.37 update

2011-11-29 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi. > Should we put the option back? Or should this option be placed somewhere > else? > In any case it seems required. Problem with hardcoding br-lan is that it must not always be a bridge (lan can be unbridged by default as well, for example on the Dockstar which ironically is a NAS appliance

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] CONFIG_EXTERNAL_KERNEL_TREE not taken in account

2011-11-29 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi. You must pick the target which matches your board, it is used across various placing, ranging from optimization flag settings to package architecture fields. The correct one for the LifeBox would be the brcm63xx target. As far as I can see it in my local test it does indeed build the ext

[OpenWrt-Devel] Maintaining multiple Samba version

2011-11-29 Thread Oliver Ertl
Hi, I'd like to discuss here what's the best way to maintain multiple versions of Samba in the package feeds. I would do it this way: - net/samba2 - ancient version - net/samba30x - the 3.0.37 version - net/samba36x - the latest version probably not stripped down Also, we also don't have t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: Reclaim unused space in WNDR3700 image

2011-11-29 Thread Mark Mentovai
Jonathan Bennett wrote: > This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What > sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small > as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on quite a few > routers. I don't know of any actual problems with the patch.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: Reclaim unused space in WNDR3700 image

2011-11-29 Thread Dave Taht
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote: > Jonathan Bennett wrote: >> This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What >> sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small >> as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on quite a few >>

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] update to new version and add init script for udpxy package

2011-11-29 Thread Nerijus Baliƫnas
This patch obsoletes http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1600/ and updates udpxy to version 1.0-Chipmunk-build21. Signed-off-by: Nerijus Baliƫnas Index: packages/net/udpxy/Makefile === --- packages/net/udpxy/Makefile (revision 29357)

[OpenWrt-Devel] Changeset 29355 - OpenVPN option enable and Luci

2011-11-29 Thread Sven Roederer
Hi, in r29355 a patch was made to accept the "option enable" and "option enabled" in config-file. Since r29167 the "option enable" was renamed to "option enabled". This change caused luci-app-openvpn to not show up the correct state (see ticket #10473). I think it's not the smartest way to hav

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Changeset 29355 - OpenVPN option enable and Luci

2011-11-29 Thread Philip Prindeville
I agree. Having the same option represented 2 different ways can break a lot of stuff... and it's just confusing. Why exactly did it need to be changed? Not sure I understand where this came from... On 11/29/11 4:17 PM, Sven Roederer wrote: > Hi, > > in r29355 a patch was made to accept the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openl2tp - finally enable config file option

2011-11-29 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 10/22/11 1:28 PM, Bogdan Roman wrote: > On 20-Oct-11 6:03 pm, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> You need to turn off "flowed=true" when posting patches. > I'm not sure what you mean. It's the first time posting patches on > openwrt ... Look at your mailer's setup. __

[OpenWrt-Devel] building image from trunk without dropbear causes impaired functionality

2011-11-29 Thread i iordanov
Hello, I built an image from trunk, but didn't need dropbear for my testing so I removed it. When I opened up the LuCI config page, and clicked on either "Go to password configuration..." or the "Administration" tab, I got this error: = /usr/lib/lua/luc

[OpenWrt-Devel] telnet login impossible after setting administrative password

2011-11-29 Thread i iordanov
In the same build from trunk, I noticed that after setting an administrative password, it is no longer possible to login with telnet: === $ telnet 192.168.2.1 -l root Trying 192.168.2.1... Connected to 192.168.2.1. Escape character is '^]'. Login failed. Connection clo

[OpenWrt-Devel] wireless problems b43 on wl500w and wrt54gs v2

2011-11-29 Thread i iordanov
Where would be a good place to report the problems I had with b43 on my Asus wl500w and Linksys wrt54gs v2? The WL500W never worked with b43, and I had errors such as: b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 508.1084 (2009-01-14 01:32:01) b43-phy0 ERROR: Fatal DMA error: 0x0400, 0x, 0x

[OpenWrt-Devel] hostname setting and network->hostnames are of no consequence

2011-11-29 Thread i iordanov
This is the last one for now! I hope I haven't been too annoying! :) 1) Setting the hostname of the router to anything does not actually add an entry to /etc/hosts. This is a problem if one expects the hostname to resolve to something, and on OpenWRT it does not resolve to anything at all! 2) Als

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] combined extended image

2011-11-29 Thread Nico
Added in r29358, with minor modifications Thanks, -- -{Nico} ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] problem with phyX interface

2011-11-29 Thread abhinav narain
hi, At many times, I set the phy0 interface on the router and on running tcpdump or my sniffer on it, gives me the following error : phy0: That device is not up How should i get rid of this error, for final deployment of my tool, as the interface fails even after creation using iw command. Kindly