[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Missing kernel config symbols for AT91 target platform

2012-04-15 Thread Hannu Nyman
I looked into buildbot snapshots and noticed that some platforms have not successfully compiled for a long time. One example is at91, which seems to be missing device-related kernel config symbols and the snapshot build crashes already there. Please find attached a patch that makes the at91

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Missing kernel config symbols for AT91 target platform

2012-04-15 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 04/15/2012 10:59 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote: I looked into buildbot snapshots and noticed that some platforms have not successfully compiled for a long time. One example is at91, which seems to be missing device-related kernel config symbols and the snapshot build crashes already there.

[OpenWrt-Devel] Rationalization of buildbot snapshots?

2012-04-15 Thread Hannu Nyman
During the long pause in buildbot snapshots last month I got interested in the snapshot builds. I noticed that some of the platforms are being built daily although they have not completed the build process successfully for 1-2 years, in some cases never. It seems like a waste of CPU power and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Rationalization of buildbot snapshots?

2012-04-15 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Hi Hannu On 04/15/2012 12:26 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote: During the long pause in buildbot snapshots last month I got interested in the snapshot builds. I noticed that some of the platforms are being built daily although they have not completed the build process successfully for 1-2 years, in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Rationalization of buildbot snapshots?

2012-04-15 Thread Hannu Nyman
On 15.4.2012 18:27, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: 2 Never: These have never completed a build succesfully, or at least it has not been uploaded to the snapshot server: ps3 kernel config symbols missing ubicom32 ERROR: Missing site config for target ubicom32-openwrt-linux-uclibc These targets are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Rationalization of buildbot snapshots?

2012-04-15 Thread Travis Kemen
Ubicom32 and ps3 have been removed from the buildbot list. It would be nice to see the other platforms fixed, maybe with the buildbot threads that have been floating around the list as of late will help spur people with these platforms to submit patches. Travis On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:11 AM,

[OpenWrt-Devel] wr941nd marvell 88e6060

2012-04-15 Thread Ashkanull
my wr941nd uses a MARVELL 88e6063 Swtich and I have these lines in backfire/build_dir/linux-ar71xx/linux-2.6.32.27/.config in r31251 seems it should support dot1q and vlaning as well CONFIG_NET_DSA=y # CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_DSA is not set # CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_EDSA is not set

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4 v2] Fix bufferbloat in PPPoATM TX queue

2012-04-15 Thread David Woodhouse
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse david.woodho...@intel.com --- Updated patch with the final commit ID now it's been merged by DaveM. .../patches-3.2/130-pppoatm-queue-depth.patch | 193 .../patches-3.3/130-pppoatm-queue-depth.patch | 193 2

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4 v2] Update Geos kernel to 3.3.2

2012-04-15 Thread David Woodhouse
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse david.woodho...@intel.com --- Too slow; my router is running 3.3.2 now... include/kernel-version.mk |3 +++ target/linux/x86/geos/target.mk |2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kernel-version.mk

[OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Jim Henderson
When I try to compile, I get the following error: --- snip --- ipnetns.o: In function `netns_exec': ipnetns.c:(.text+0xfc): undefined reference to `unshare' ipnetns.o: In function `netns_add': ipnetns.c:(.text+0x54c): undefined reference to `unshare' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-04-15 11:53 PM, Jim Henderson wrote: When I try to compile, I get the following error: --- snip --- ipnetns.o: In function `netns_exec': ipnetns.c:(.text+0xfc): undefined reference to `unshare' ipnetns.o: In function `netns_add': ipnetns.c:(.text+0x54c): undefined reference to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Jim Henderson
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:59:15 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: OpenWrt has been using uClibc 0.9.33 for a while now, whereas you seem to be using 0.9.32. It looks like 0.9.33 provides that missing function. Awesome, thanks - seems the last time uClibc was updated I had a similar issue, and had

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-04-16 12:10 AM, Jim Henderson wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:59:15 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: OpenWrt has been using uClibc 0.9.33 for a while now, whereas you seem to be using 0.9.32. It looks like 0.9.33 provides that missing function. Awesome, thanks - seems the last time uClibc

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Hanno Schupp
I am curious as I was not even aware that you could tell the compile process to use one uClib erosion or another. I thought that was fixed through the toolchain compile process. How do you get the buildroot process to use a certain uClib version then? Kind Regards Hanno Schupp Connect

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixes for D-Link DVA-G3810BN/TL (1)

2012-04-15 Thread Jeroen van Bemmel
Attached the patch to fix support for the D-Link DVA-G3810BN, generated by quilt Signed-Off-By: Jeroen van Bemmel jbem...@zonnet.nl --- a/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c +++ b/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c @@ -2137,6 +2137,71 @@ static struct board_info __initdata boar

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixes for D-Link DVA-G3810BN/TL (2)

2012-04-15 Thread Jeroen van Bemmel
Attached patch fixes a typo in the image Makefile, and overrides the board name for DVA-G3810BN to set the correct board properties Signed-Off-By: Jeroen van Bemmel jbem...@zonnet.nl Index: Makefile === --- Makefile(revision

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compile error - r31299

2012-04-15 Thread Jim Henderson
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:10:32 +1200, Hanno Schupp wrote: I am curious as I was not even aware that you could tell the compile process to use one uClib erosion or another. I thought that was fixed through the toolchain compile process. How do you get the buildroot process to use a certain