Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:49:18AM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote:
> Appreciate your work really but just my 5ct: noone needs IPv6 if not in
> search for troubles or many new (security)-problems.
Welcome to the 21st century.
There are ISPs in Asia today(!) that *will* *not* give you an I
Thanks, applied in r31442
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thanks, applied in r31443
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ee /LICENSE for more information.
+#
+
+include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
+
+PKG_NAME:=vpnc-scripts
+PKG_VERSION:=20120423
+PKG_RELEASE:=1
+
+PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz
+PKG_SOURCE_URL:=ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/vpnc-scripts/
+PKG_MD5SUM:=3265dc7fe57ae9b4c905961a28699c4c
+
+include $(INC
This is very basic — username/password only, and doesn't even check
certificates which it *definitely* should. But it's a good start.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse
---
net/openconnect/Makefile |8 ++-
net/openconnect/files/openconnect.sh | 39 +++
net/openconnect
add new router UR-336UN
--
Lebedev Dmitry
target_changes.path
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello,
Le 19/04/2012 18:40, Emmanuel Deloget a écrit :
I have no idea on how we can fix this, other than setting the correct
version numbers in the CONFIG_EGLIBC_VERSION.
I can provide a patch to fix the current state, but that would not make
much sense if 2.12 is to be removed from the tree.
Hi all,
I've manifested my interest in the AT91 a couple of weeks ago, and
nobody even answer any of my calls.
I would like to work hand in hand with other peoples that use AT91 based
boards.
Obviously, someone started some important modifications on the at91
directory, which look like a good
eglibc version number depends on the branch and on the maintenance release
(i.e. the SVN revision). Changing the revision may change the maintenance
version. This patch correlate the SVN revision to the correct version
number - without this change, both eglibc 2.12 and eglibc 2.14 provoke
build er
When selecting a specific eglibc version, it comes with a specific SVN
revision that should not be modified as it (more or less) correspond to
a tagged release. This patch disable the possibility to select a specific
SVN revision on known eglib versions while it still provide the
functionnality if
When selecting a specific eglibc version, it comes with a specific SVN
revision that should not be modified as it (more or less) correspond to
a tagged release. This patch disable the possibility to select a specific
SVN revision on known eglib versions.
This patch also disables the possibility t
I promise this is the last fix to this patch submission!
This patch updates avahi to latest version -- 0.6.31. From the release notes:
"This is a bugfix release and mostly makes things work with current autoconf
again."
It allows us to remove the OpenWrt-specific automake patch.
This patch also
2012.04.22. 11:31 keltezéssel, Frédéric Leroy írta:
> This patch adds support for the ASUS WL-330N3G
>
> Comparing to the WL-330N, It have 32MB ram, usb support and a bicolor led.
>
> The bi-color led is driven by 2 gpio.
> I don't know how to handle this, so I simply made 2 leds : one red, one b
2012.04.23. 13:42 keltezéssel, Дмитрий Лебедев írta:
> add new router UR-336UN
Applied.
Thanks,
Gabor
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
but with a caveat.
On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North America and Europe,
so I think it is desirable to be able to turn it off.
Ri
Hi -
./script/feeds update -a can't connect. Connection refused. Other feeds are
working fine.
Cheers,
Elektra
--
Elektra
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:40 -0700, Bill Moffitt wrote:
>
>
> On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
> but with a caveat.
>
> On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
> not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North America and
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:40:00AM -0700, Bill Moffitt wrote:
> On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
> but with a caveat.
>
> On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
> not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North Americ
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 20:14 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> (Now, what I'm not sure whether OpenWRT already has this: to fully
> utilize IPv6 over here, what you need to have is dynamic IPv6 prefix
> support using DHCP-PD. As in "router queries ISP for a prefix, ISP
> assigns 2001:db8:1::/56, router
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse
---
contrib/package/luci/Makefile |1 +
protocols/openconnect/Makefile |2 +
.../model/cbi/admin_network/proto_openconnect.lua | 62 +++
.../luasrc/model/network/proto_openconnect.lua | 63 ++
In package/kernel/modules/001-depends.mk there are the following lines:
define SetDepends/rfkill
DEPENDS:=
@(TARGET_ar71xx||TARGET_brcm47xx||TARGET_s3c24xx||TARGET_x86||TARGET_gemini)
endef
-
define AddDepends/rfkill
DEPENDS+=
+(TARGET_ar71xx||TARGET_brcm47xx||TARGET_s3c24xx||TARGET_x86):k
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:43 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 20:14 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> (Now, what I'm not sure whether OpenWRT already has this: to fully
>> utilize IPv6 over here, what you need to have is dynamic IPv6 prefix
>> support using DHCP-PD. As in "router q
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
possible.
Nit to pick: calling this "sla_len" is a bit weird. Especially if
you don't know whethe
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:33:00PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> > (And no, I wouldn't advocate 6to4 being enabled by default anyway).
>
> I had it enabled by default during comcast's trials. It worked great,
> on their network (and having a /48 was good too). It didn't work very
> well elsewhere
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:32 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
>
> Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
> possible.
>
> Nit to pick: calling thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
though really OT, its a really important point for a "Router-Distro"
as which I love OpenWRT; so I'd want to explain my point.
And I also read the RIPE-lists where I often have to swallow *not* to
respond to all those IPv6-hurrays which arent pres
Don't use format=flowed.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
On 4/21/12 6:50 PM, ching wrote:
> sorry again, the previous email subject is wrong
>
> I don't know why my attachment is detected as binary, i reposted it here
> as plain text
Hi,
I had problems sending mails to the list yesterday.
Please ignore this test.
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Christian Gagneraud,
Il 23 aprile 2012 14:52, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I've manifested my interest in the AT91 a couple of weeks ago, and nobody
> even answer any of my calls.
> I would like to work hand in hand with other peoples that use AT91 based
> boards.
> Obviously,
29 matches
Mail list logo
