On 11 November 2014 23:26, Alex Henrie wrote:
> Is no one interested? Come on, I'm offering free hardware to play with ;-)
I already have about 10-20 Broadcom based boars in my drawer ;) Not
that excited with another one.
However I'd be happy to help adding support for WNR1000 v3. Could you
atta
Hi Luka,
For me is the same... just to compliant comment inside source code:
/* on asterisk user's side, we're using port 1-2.
* Here in non normal human's world, we begin
* counting at 0.
*/
So you confirm that "TAPI/%s","1" map both port0 and port1 to TAPI/1 and
you can't use asterisk exten
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Is there any way to disable auto-negotiation on an ethernet interface and
> manually set the speed and duplex parameters for it via netifd? (some
> equivalent of "option autonegotiate 0", etc.?) I couldn't find anything in
> netifd that wou
Our box has to deal with a few broken external switches that don't
auto-negotiate properly. (Our box is based on an Intel Rangeley Atom, with the
IGB driver for eth0/1, and we're running BB, more or less - tip of the
barrier_breaker branch).
Is there any way to disable auto-negotiation on an et
Is no one interested? Come on, I'm offering free hardware to play with ;-)
-Alex
2014-11-01 18:55 GMT-06:00 Alex Henrie :
> Hi,
>
> I have an extra Netgear N150 WNR1000 v3 (FCC ID: PY309300117, IC:
> 4054A-09300117). WikiDevi says that it has 4 MiB of flash memory.
>
> Is anyone interested in wor
Hi Eddi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:11:13PM +0100, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
> it seems it work better in this way...
>
> chan = ast_channel_alloc(1, state, NULL, NULL, "", ext, ctx, 0, c,
> "TAPI/%d", (c + 1));
>
> I don't know so well asterisk programming... please let me know if it seems
> correct
Drop industrialio-triggered-buffer.ko from the package and
depend on kmod-iio-core.
Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer
---
target/linux/mxs/modules.mk |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I found this while working on some other bug that causes files to be missing
from kmod
it seems it work better in this way...
chan = ast_channel_alloc(1, state, NULL, NULL, "", ext, ctx, 0, c,
"TAPI/%d", (c + 1));
I don't know so well asterisk programming... please let me know if it seems
correct to you!
Eddi
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
> Hi Eddi,
>
> I don't remember if that worked on owsip. But asterisk should support
> both channels.
>
> What about TAPI/0? I am unsure if we started naming the channels from 0
> or 1...
>
> /* on asterisk user's side, we're using port 1-2.
*
Hi Eddi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:10:30PM +0100, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
> asterisk:
> set debug output on console
> console => notice,warning,error,debug
>
> so, all software recognize correctly the correct port
>
> [Nov 11 15:08:06] DEBUG[894]: chan_lantiq.c:835 lantiq_dev_event_hook: on
>
Hi again,
asterisk:
set debug output on console
console => notice,warning,error,debug
so, all software recognize correctly the correct port
[Nov 11 15:08:06] DEBUG[894]: chan_lantiq.c:835 lantiq_dev_event_hook: on
port 0 detected event off hook
[Nov 11 15:08:10] DEBUG[894]: chan_lantiq.c:835
If kernel is compiled with cgroup support it should be mounted. This change
does not effect kernels without cgroup support.
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov
---
I'd prefer to put this here rather then having init script which does the same.
initd/early.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -
12 matches
Mail list logo
