Linuxptp is a user space software implementation of IEEE 1588
Precision Time Protocol standard.
V2: Removed uClibc patches
Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik
---
net/linuxptp/Makefile | 51 +
net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch | 14 +
On 13/01/2016 09:00, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> diff --git a/net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch
> b/net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..618a958
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +Index: linuxptp-20
Linuxptp is a user space software implementation of IEEE 1588
Precision Time Protocol standard.
v3: Remove offending UCLIBC references
Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik
---
net/linuxptp/Makefile | 51 +
net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch | 12
Apologies, I was working with an old fork of Openwrt.
another version (hopefully the last) will be sent soon.
Regards,
Amine.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
> * amine ahd [12.01.2016 10:08]:
> > ---
> > package/utils/busybox/Makefile | 3 ++
> > package/
On 2016-01-13 10:25, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Leonardo Brondani Schenkel
> # Date 1452674412 -3600
> # Wed Jan 13 09:40:12 2016 +0100
> # Node ID ec9c6531ce00d10f7fa0e947d65dfc1acdb09551
> # Parent 3b05804d46b9e73181278a407be5e9ac3c572941
> mac80211:
On 13/01/2016 10:37, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-13 10:25, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel wrote:
> The feature is already implemented (see two lines above the one you
> added here). This change is not necessary.
My apologies. It was an oversight. I actually implemented this for CC
(it was not th
On 2016-01-13 08:50, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 13/01/2016 08:47, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
>> ++#if defined(__UCLIBC__)
>> ++/* This syscall is not defined in uClibc 0.93.2 */
>> ++#include
>> ++static int clock_adjtime(clockid_t id, struct timex *tx)
>> ++{
>> ++ return syscall(__NR_clock_ad
On 13/01/2016 12:03, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-13 08:50, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/01/2016 08:47, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
>>> ++#if defined(__UCLIBC__)
>>> ++/* This syscall is not defined in uClibc 0.93.2 */
>>> ++#include
>>> ++static int clock_adjtime(clockid_t id, struct tim
On 2016-01-13 12:05, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 13/01/2016 12:03, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-01-13 08:50, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2016 08:47, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
++#if defined(__UCLIBC__)
++/* This syscall is not defined in uClibc 0.93.2 */
++#include
>
On 13/01/2016 12:25, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-13 12:05, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/01/2016 12:03, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-13 08:50, John Crispin wrote:
On 13/01/2016 08:47, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> ++#if defined(__UCLIBC__)
> ++/* This syscall
Linuxptp is a user space software implementation of IEEE 1588
Precision Time Protocol standard.
v4: Don't compile on uclibc
Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik
---
net/linuxptp/Makefile | 50 +
net/linuxptp/patches/001-musl-fix.patch | 12
Hi is any router using the mwl8k driver werth bothring with? I have the
chance to get my hands on a EA4500 thoughts?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Conn,
On 2016-01-10 05:20, Conn O'Griofa wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> It appears that my hunch was correct, and both are necessary. The
> following patch works 100% fine; when the dma stuck condition occurs,
> recovery now completes without any link adjust or any other output
> from the kernel log*.
Hi,
I'm looking at the 'Default' profiles in architectures and as far as I
can tell the only architecture that currently uses Default to mean
'build all profiles for this arch-subtarget'. Is that correct.
I've seen other 00-default.mk profiles by on most archs this seems to be
used as a gen
As per Felix's suggestion I have implemented a detection of 'in lxc'
logic and modified base-files and busybox sysntpd script to use that
check to avoid actions inappropriate for an LXC guest, and to act
normally otherwise. The patch still needs to be tested as an LXC guest,
but causes no misb
On 2016-01-13 18:04, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the 'Default' profiles in architectures and as far as I
> can tell the only architecture that currently uses Default to mean
> 'build all profiles for this arch-subtarget'. Is that correct.
>
> I've seen other 00-default.mk
On 13/01/2016 18:10, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> As per Felix's suggestion I have implemented a detection of 'in lxc'
> logic and modified base-files and busybox sysntpd script to use that
> check to avoid actions inappropriate for an LXC guest, and to act
> normally otherwise. The patch still nee
Sorry, I wasn clear I guess. I mean I'm not clear on how or if other
targets use the 'Default' profile to select building all images for that
target. That is, my question is whether ar71xx is the only target for
which the Default profile selects building all available images.
Regards,
Danie
Hi John,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
wrote:
> Here's the kernel log from the TD-W8970: https://paste.kde.org/pia7p73i9
> I have debugged it and split_tplink_kernel gets 0x2 as offset and
> 0x7A as size (which looks correct). However, when mtd_read tries to
> read
Hi Martin,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2016, 20:23 +0100 schrieb Martin Blumenstingl:
> Hi John,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
> wrote:
> > Here's the kernel log from the TD-W8970:
> > https://paste.kde.org/pia7p73i9
> > I have debugged it and split_tplink_kernel gets 0x20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Add support for Netgear WPN824N.
Hardware specs:
* AR7240, 4 LAN ports, 1 WAN port
* AR9285 WLAN
* 32 MB RAM
* 4 MB Flash
* 16 LEDs (LAN, WAN and Power/Status contain two LEDs for dual color
effect)
* 3 Buttons (not supported)
Signed
Patchwork failed to send confirmation email to my email address, for the
account cshore AND there is not password reset option, nor means to
re-request confirmation email AND it won't let me register an already
registered email address AND I can't login because the account is
'inactive' (probab
Hi,
On Montag, 11. Januar 2016 23:45:39 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > Any comments to this usage/syntax? It doesn't look too nice (this long
> > quoted string as a value), but swconfig is strongly focused on simple
> > values.
>
> One more RFC... anyone?
I am not an OpenWRT core developer so I canno
On Jan 13, 2016 10:07 PM, "Stefan Rompf" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 11. Januar 2016 23:45:39 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> > > Any comments to this usage/syntax? It doesn't look too nice (this long
> > > quoted string as a value), but swconfig is strongly focused on simple
> > > values.
> >
> > One
24 matches
Mail list logo
