Hi,
Even jow@openwrt and blogic@openwrt do not exist anymore as of now.
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
While for example juhosg@openwrt still exists.
I just hope this will not become another "ffmpeg vs libav"...
Cheers,
Vittorio
On 05/05/2016 02:00:29 CES
On 16-05-04 04:01 PM, mbm wrote:
> Dear OpenWrt community,
>
> spin off the OpenWrt project in the first place as a way to fix the
> project and its community. Also, the phrases such as a "reboot" are both
> vague and misleading and the LEDE project failed to identify its true
> nature. The LEDE a
Backport changeset 48994
Add GT-MT750 support to CC
Signed-off-by: alzhao
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 3 +
.../linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 7 +
target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh | 3 +
.../ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/plat
Backport of changeset 47620, add support of GL-AR150 to cc
Signed-off-by: Alfie Zhao
---
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 4 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 1 +
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 3 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/lib/u
Backport changeset 48993
Add GL-MT300N support to CC
Signed-off-by: alzhao
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 3 +
.../linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 7 +
target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh | 3 +
.../ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/pla
Backport of changeset 48992
Add GL-MT300A support
Signed-off-by: alzhao
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 3 +
.../linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 7 +
target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh | 3 +
.../ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platfo
Backport of changeset 47622
Add GL-Domino Pi dev board support
Signed-off-by: alzhao
---
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 4 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 1 +
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 3 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/lib/u
Backport of changeset 47621
Add support for GL-AR300
Signed-off-by: alzhao
---
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 4 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 6 ++
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 3 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/pl
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote:
> Thanks Daniel. That explains a lot.
> I imagine if some digging is done it would be possible to find the holders
> of the critical resources and then re-organize it from scratch within the
> OpenWrt Project.
> But as the fork has already h
Thanks Daniel. That explains a lot.
I imagine if some digging is done it would be possible to find the holders
of the critical resources and then re-organize it from scratch within the
OpenWrt Project.
But as the fork has already happened there is no much point in doing that.
Regards,
Fernando
On
On 16-05-04 07:59 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote:
> Just curious to know by the names that signed the announcement of the
> new project being know OpenWrt Developers why weren't there enough votes
> inside OpenWrt to do this reboot and reorganize it completely under the
> LEDE Project ideas ?
I don't
Hi,
How does one get in touch with Felix these days? n...@openwrt.org
bounces for me.
Regards,
Daniel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Just curious to know by the names that signed the announcement of the new
project being know OpenWrt Developers why weren't there enough votes inside
OpenWrt to do this reboot and reorganize it completely under the LEDE
Project ideas ?
The LEDE ideas are great and the the long time and outstanding
On 16-05-04 07:21 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On 16-05-04 07:01 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> On 16-05-04 06:52 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>>>
>>> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> It also seems to me (as an outsider) that those who do contribute are
> small open-source minded companies, and that's a fair
On 16-05-04 07:32 PM, Kathy Giori wrote:
>
> Daniel I fully concur that industry "give back" is severely lacking.
> It seems to me that the bigger the company, the less likely they are
> to give back. One of the goals of the prpl Foundation was to help big
> industry members to better "see" that p
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
> On 16-05-04 12:25 PM, Kathy Giori wrote:
>> Also wearing my hat within the prpl Foundation, which is funded by
>> industry sponsorships that in turn provides financial support for
>> OpenWrt, no one I have spoken to in prpl understands the
On 16-05-04 07:01 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On 16-05-04 06:52 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>>>
>>> Silly question, but can you outline some specific examples of
>>> contributions that an outsider like me has somehow missed as
>>> being as concrete examples of companies
On 16-05-04 06:52 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>>
>> Silly question, but can you outline some specific examples of
>> contributions that an outsider like me has somehow missed as
>> being as concrete examples of companies contributing back to
>> openwrt, rather than just be
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>
> Silly question, but can you outline some specific examples of
> contributions that an outsider like me has somehow missed as
> being as concrete examples of companies contributing back to
> openwrt, rather than just benefiting from it?
Every commit from me. We're a t
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 21:19 +0100, tapper wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
> >
> > Dear OpenWrt community,
> >
> > It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we
> > read
> > about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was
> > no
> > prior announcement
El 04/05/2016 a las 23:40, Daniel Dickinson escribió:
On 16-05-04 12:25 PM, Kathy Giori wrote:
Also wearing my hat within the prpl Foundation, which is funded by
industry sponsorships that in turn provides financial support for
OpenWrt, no one I have spoken to in prpl understands the reason for
On 16-05-04 12:25 PM, Kathy Giori wrote:
> Also wearing my hat within the prpl Foundation, which is funded by
> industry sponsorships that in turn provides financial support for
> OpenWrt, no one I have spoken to in prpl understands the reason for
> this spin-off either. It'll cause more confusion
On 4 May 2016 at 23:19, tapper wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
>>
>> Dear OpenWrt community,
>>
>> It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read
>> about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no
>> prior announcement nor clues this would happe
On 04/05/2016 21:01, mbm wrote:
Dear OpenWrt community,
It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read
about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no
prior announcement nor clues this would happen.
While we recognize the current OpenWrt project suffe
Dear OpenWrt community,
It is with a great amount of surprise that, like all of you, we read
about the announcement of the LEDE project yesterday, as there was no
prior announcement nor clues this would happen.
While we recognize the current OpenWrt project suffers from a number of
issues ou
Hei hei,
On 04.05.2016 20:57, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> Well, like you said yourself, why they didn't start discussing the
> problems (and possible solutions) in open space then?
I can not speak for OpenWRT or LEDE developers, but let me give an
example on one topic I watched the last weeks, which
Hi Andrej,
Am 28.04.2016 um 23:59 schrieb Andrej Vlasic:
> Hi Josua,
>
> On 28.04.2016 17:03, josua.maye...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Josua Mayer
>>
>> This is especially useful on the Clearfog board which boots from mmc by
>> default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
>> ---
>> target/linux/mv
From: Josua Mayer
The clearfog can boot from sdcard or emmc, so make the required driver builtin.
Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
---
target/linux/mvebu/harddisk/config-default | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 target/linux/mvebu/harddisk/config-defaul
From: Josua Mayer
This target is meant for any mvebu-based boards that can boot from internal
or external storage devices such as mmc, emmc, sata.
The Clearfog board is the first one this profile was applied to.
Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
---
target/linux/mvebu/generic/profiles/solidrun.mk |
From: Josua Mayer
This makes room to add other targets.
Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
---
target/linux/mvebu/generic/profiles/000-Default.mk | 26 ++
target/linux/mvebu/generic/profiles/globalscale.mk | 21 +
target/linux/mvebu/generic/profiles/linksys.mk | 85 +++
tar
From: Josua Mayer
Added gen_mvebu_sdcard_img.sh to create bootable sdcard images. It takes
the bootloader and partition images to create a bootable sdcard image.
Partition Layout:
p1: fat32: for kernel, dtb and boot config files if any
p2: squashfs: for openwrt
This change is developed for the
It's not unusual for developers who disagree with project management issues to
fork a project.
I am also interested in who is left in OpenWRT and what their viewpoint is.
Have the developers who are founding LEDE given up their commit privileges in
OpenWRT? or are they going to be workting a b
On 4 May 2016 at 21:35, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> It is really strange that the decision to create a new project was so opaque
> when it was motivated to be a more "transparent project".
> They could've started to be more transparent already with the decision to
> create a new project.
>
It is really strange that the decision to create a new project was so
opaque when it was motivated to be a more "transparent project".
They could've started to be more transparent already with the decision to
create a new project.
Maybe the answer for the need of an external reboot might be not in
On 4 May 2016 at 19:25, Kathy Giori wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community
>> .
>>
>> The project is founded as a spin-off of the OpenWrt project and shares
>> many of the same goals.
>
> While I
A few linux BSP's create a manifest file of installed packages for a given
target in order to help them understand exactly what's on their images. Create
one for OpenWrt as well as a build artifact since many users have an affinity to
prune down on packages to save valuable flash space.
Signed-off
Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 03/05/16 18:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community
>> ...
>> Jo-Philipp Wich,
>> John Crispin,
>> Daniel Golle,
>> Felix Fietkau,
>> Hauke Mehrtens
>> John Crispin
>> Matthias S
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community
> .
>
> The project is founded as a spin-off of the OpenWrt project and shares
> many of the same goals.
While I appreciate the enthusiasm, I do not see why you cannot
Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community
On a purely logistical note, is there any purpose in sending
patches/pulls/bugs to _openwrt-devel_ any more? It sounds like
there's effectively no-one left to read them.
What about procd, fstools, l
From: Graham Fairweather
This patch fixes the logged detected CPU ID when an equivalent is
used, like in the case where we have a bcm6369 and configuration for a
bcm6368 is used. More info can be found
at:https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=64621https://github.com/Xotic750/openwrt/tree/fix
I'm a new comer to this community, and first experiencing with the use of
OpenWrt both as firmware and developing it, so I don't feel much entitled to
have a word here.
But I find it is a great product and want to contribute to the project, so I'll
share my perspective as someone who would like
Hi everyone,
please note that this patch is not final in that the code does not look
for device-node-names, but for a partition name.
But don't hesitate to comment anyway!
Am 04.05.2016 um 14:45 schrieb josua.maye...@gmail.com:
> From: Josua Mayer
>
> This change adds code to handle a new optio
From: Josua Mayer
This change adds code to handle a new option on cmdline: overlay=
This is used to find the rootfs_data partition / disk when it has a
non-standard name or location.
It takes either the device node name, or the full path to the device node:
i.e. /dev/mmcblk0p3 or mmcblk0p3
This
From: Josua Mayer
The done()-function is used both to initialize rootfs_data when there is
no filesystem yet, but also to set ready-state on fresh filesystems.
Make sure to also do that when a non-standard overlay device is specified.
Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
---
mount_root.c | 33 +
From: Josua Mayer
The done()-function is used both to initialize rootfs_data when there is
no filesystem yet, but also to set ready-state on fresh filesystems.
Make sure to also do that when a non-standard overlay device is specified.
Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer
---
mount_root.c | 33 +
From: Josua Mayer
This change adds code to handle a new option on cmdline: overlay=
This is used to find the rootfs_data partition / disk when it has a
non-standard name or location.
It takes either the device node name, or the full path to the device node:
i.e. /dev/mmcblk0p3 or mmcblk0p3
This
Hi Ram,
Thanks for your comments. Now it appears I misunderstood what the code
is supposed to match.
So if there is a PARTNAME= line, it can be matched.
However on my system I dont have PARTNAME.
Here a real-life sample:
root@OpenWrt:/# cat /sys/block/mmcblk0/mmcblk0p3/uevent
MAJOR=179
MINOR=3
DE
Bump to the latest version, fixes several security issues:
* CVE-2016-2107, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2176
Signed-off-by: Michal Hrusecky
---
package/libs/openssl/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Ma
Alexander Dahl - 14:21 4.05.16 wrote:
> Hei hei,
>
> Am 2016-05-04 13:53, schrieb Michal Hrusecky:
> > -PKG_MD5SUM:=b784b1b3907ce39abf4098702dade6365522a253ad1552e267a9a0e89594aa33
> > +PKG_MD5SUM:=9392e65072ce4b614c1392eefc1f23d0
>
> You replaced the sha256sum of openssl-1.0.2g.tar.gz with the
Hei hei,
Am 2016-05-04 13:53, schrieb Michal Hrusecky:
> -PKG_MD5SUM:=b784b1b3907ce39abf4098702dade6365522a253ad1552e267a9a0e89594aa33
> +PKG_MD5SUM:=9392e65072ce4b614c1392eefc1f23d0
You replaced the sha256sum of openssl-1.0.2g.tar.gz with the md5sum of
openssl-1.0.2h.tar.gz. Why the "downgrade"
Bump to the latest version, fixes several security issues:
* CVE-2016-2107, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2176
More details at https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-1.0.2-notes.html
Signed-off-by: Michal Hrusecky
---
package/libs/openssl/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed,
>From times to times, a complete Refresh is needed to purge old habits.
Let's face it. The name OpenWRT reflects the initial idea, an Open Wireless
Router. I don't know about the main uses, but I have a router using OpenWRT
which doesn't even has a wireless interface.
I also have seen cases where
This patch adds support for the Comfast CF-WR650AC to Chaos Calmer.
More information is located at:
http://en.comfast.com.cn/product/SmartRepeater/item-217.html
I haven't been able to add this to Trunk as mac06_exchange_en is required
and was changed in r47956. Without it the router hangs then r
The only thing that seems to improve from my perspective is normal git pull
requests instead of antiquated email patches. The name change and that 90's
style website will only confuse the users.
> Am 04.05.2016 um 00:50 schrieb Roman Yeryomin :
>
>> On 3 May 2016 at 23:19, Bruno Randolf wrote:
On 4 May 2016 at 10:31, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 4 May 2016 at 09:13, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>>> wrote:
On 3 May 2016 at 23:19, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 03/05
Hostapd allows more than one RADIUS server to be added in case the main server
goes down.
This allows netifd to load a list of RADIUS servers from the wireless confid
file and add them to hostapd.
The format of the list in the config file is as follow:
list auth_servers 'secret@server_add
On 4 May 2016 at 09:13, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Roman Yeryomin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3 May 2016 at 23:19, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>>> > On 03/05/16 18:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>> >> we'd like to int
57 matches
Mail list logo
