Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Thanks for moving this forward. On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote: > *) github . > > - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months As long as it does not cost us effort I would like to keep the lede domains and github project up running for longer. > *) landing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/09/2017 10:12 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> >>> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: *) domain - transfer owner ship to SPI for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] Im > Auftrag von Imre Kaloz > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017 11:36 > > On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > > > I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] ata: Add DT bindings for Faraday Technology FTIDE010

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Monday, May 08, 2017 10:26:49 PM Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >> wrote: >> So depending on whether they use an FPGA or

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] clk: Add bindings for the Gemini Clock Controller

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> +Example: + +syscon: syscon@4000 { +

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] GSOC 2017 - Implement NetJSON output in ubus (OpenWRT/LEDE)

Hi Arun, welcome to the community! Just to provide more information, we have to thank Freifunk for their help in getting this GSOC slot, here's the abstract that got this project started: https://wiki.freifunk.net/Ideas#Implement_NetJSON_output_in_ubus_.28OpenWRT.2FLEDE.29 Best regards

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

So many items to vote and work on. I would suggest we sort out those formal things first, e.g. project rules, umbrella project etc. I do not know much about the past history apart from those posts in the public mailing list. But if these formal things were the major cause of the split in the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if I can. It would be handy to have a single database for user authentication/identification for submitting bugs, editing the Wiki, etc. Previously there were too many places where you had

[OpenWrt-Devel] GSOC 2017 - Implement NetJSON output in ubus (OpenWRT/LEDE)

Hi Developers, I am Arunkumar Ravichandran currently admitted for masters program at University of California, San Diego. My proposal *Implement NetJSON output in ubus (OpenWRT/LEDE)* has been accepted to the