Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io
Commit: 6bb22e3b77caeb9b283610ce8d7b1d42bb4dc1e9
https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io/commit/6bb22e3b77caeb9b283610ce8d7b1d42bb4dc1e9
Author: Stephen Walker
Date: 2019-12-15 (Sun, 15 Dec
Well, we could change it for ath79 and ramips right now, would be a simple
rename without side effects.
We could use just SOC as proposed. I'd prefer to decide on the name right away
and then would apply the patch directly without sending it to the list, to save
us from rebasing...
Best
According to many bugreports [0][1][2] the default ath10k-ct kernel
module is unusable on devices with just 64 MiB RAM or with 128 MiB and
dual ath10k cards. The target boards boot but eventually oom-killer
starts to interfere with normal operation, so the current state is
effectively broken.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 05:53:42PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent
> to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
In a way those variables should be unified into something like 'SOC'...
For now, maybe 'LTQ_SOC' will do
On 12/15/19 5:53 PM, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent
> to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
>
> Best
>
> Adrian
Lantiq currently has these 3:
CONFIG_SOC_AMAZON_SE
CONFIG_SOC_XWAY
CONFIG_SOC_FALCON
I would use these
Hi,
how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent to
ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
Best
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
> Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
>
Update linux-firmware to 20191215
git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit 20190815..20191215
eefb5f7 inside-secure: add new "mini" firmware for the EIP197 driver
dd1a12e Merge branch 'RB3-adsp-cdsp-mss-v4' of
https://github.com/andersson/linux-firmware
c523dcd WHENCE: Add raspberr
On 12/15/2019 05:09 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 13:01:14 CET Paul Fertser wrote:
Thank you for the answer Christian,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 12:00:48PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
I think for this to have any chance of moving forward you'll need to
On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
>> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
>>
>> However, I
Hi Adrian,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
>
> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is
Hi,
I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is useful there, or
whether it wouldn't be better to just use "vendor_model.dts" ...
Any thoughts on
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 13:01:14 CET Paul Fertser wrote:
> Thank you for the answer Christian,
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 12:00:48PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > I think for this to have any chance of moving forward you'll need to
> > pressure your ODMs and if that doesn't work: Go
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 12:00:48PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> From what I remember Sven Eckelmann also measured the impact from the
> patches on the performance and posted his results to the OpenWrt ML
> (google will find them).
https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/pull/1440 is what
Thank you for the answer Christian,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 12:00:48PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> I think for this to have any chance of moving forward you'll need to
> pressure your ODMs and if that doesn't work: Go with a different WIFI
> chip vendor that supports low memory devices,
On Wednesday, 11 December 2019 20:16:52 CET Paul Fertser wrote:
> Hey Ben,
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:06:26AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 12/11/19 6:44 AM, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > According to many bugreports [0][1][2] the default ath10k-ct kernel
> ...
> > And also if you want to just
15 matches
Mail list logo
