Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] build: update scritps/config to kconfig-v5.6

2020-04-11 Thread Eneas Queiroz
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 7:23 PM Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > Hi Eneas, > > I am sorry but I had to completely revert the kconfig bump. It thoroughly > broke the package repository builds since multiple days and the fatal > recursive dependencies make it a no-go for master, at least as far as our >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] build: update scritps/config to kconfig-v5.6

2020-04-11 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Eneas, I am sorry but I had to completely revert the kconfig bump. It thoroughly broke the package repository builds since multiple days and the fatal recursive dependencies make it a no-go for master, at least as far as our build infrastructure is concerned. Right now, a single malformed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] mvebu: add support for GL.iNet GL-MV1000

2020-04-11 Thread mail
Hi, some comments below (no full review yet). > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Li Zhang > Sent: Samstag, 11. April 2020 06:18 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Li Zhang > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH]

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for GL.iNet GL-X1200

2020-04-11 Thread mail
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of guilin.w...@gl-inet.com > Sent: Freitag, 10. April 2020 05:44 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: guilin.w...@gl-inet.com > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 19.07 v2] ramips: add support for Asus RT-N10P V3 / RT-N11P B1 / RT-N12 VP B1

2020-04-11 Thread mail
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Ernst Spielmann > Sent: Donnerstag, 9. April 2020 19:27 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Ernst Spielmann > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 19.07 v2] ramips: add

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Phase2 packages buildbot has failed since the kconfig changes

2020-04-11 Thread Eneas Queiroz
It would be easier if I could reproduce the bug locally. I would like to take a look at the failed 'Config-build.in' (haven't seen this file ever), and 'tmp/.config-package.in'. Meanwhile, I will try my luck with the SDK, which I don't do very often myself. Do the phase1 bots have the feeds

[OpenWrt-Devel] MT7621 and bridge firewalling

2020-04-11 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hello OpenWrt hackers, I'm playing around with OpenWrt master on a MikroTik RB750Gr3 and would like to do hardware accelerated statefull bridge firewalling. My end goal is to learn and make PhanTap (https://github.com/nccgroup/phantap) work at line rate. MT7621 supports flow offload, so the high

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Phase2 packages buildbot has failed since the kconfig changes

2020-04-11 Thread Hannu Nyman
Hannu Nyman kirjoitti 11.4.2020 klo 17.07: But most errors seem to be related to recursive errors inside the rather complex mac80211 wifi driver collection. I have a hunch that for buildbot the "treat recursive dependencies as warnings instead of errors" option (from 3204430e3 ) should be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Phase2 packages buildbot has failed since the kconfig changes

2020-04-11 Thread Eneas Queiroz
Hi On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:07 AM Hannu Nyman wrote: > > Looks like the recent kconfig changes broke the whole packages buildbot. > > (For some weird reason, the arc targets succeed, but all others fail > miserably... ) > > > http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/packages/grid > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: switch to kernel 5.4

2020-04-11 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 4/11/20 5:13 PM, David Bauer wrote: > Hello Paul, > > On 4/3/20 10:58 PM, Paul Blazejowski wrote: >> Hello David, >> >> It is great to hear to we're switching to 5.4 on ath79 target but i >> wanted to bring to your attention that at least on the NAND subtargets >> (for me wndr3700v4) we need

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: switch to kernel 5.4

2020-04-11 Thread David Bauer
Hello Paul, On 4/3/20 10:58 PM, Paul Blazejowski wrote: Hello David, It is great to hear to we're switching to 5.4 on ath79 target but i wanted to bring to your attention that at least on the NAND subtargets (for me wndr3700v4) we need this commit [1] from Kevin to get the router to boot

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Java compiler

2020-04-11 Thread Dana Myers
On 4/10/2020 1:48 PM, W. Michael Petullo wrote: Has anyone tried to build a Java compiler package for OpenWrt? I am investigating doing this. I see the lang/jamvm JVM, but no compiler akin to devel/gcc or lang/golang. I have packaged a number of things, but I suspect this will be a bit more of a

[OpenWrt-Devel] Phase2 packages buildbot has failed since the kconfig changes

2020-04-11 Thread Hannu Nyman
Looks like the recent kconfig changes broke the whole packages buildbot. (For some weird reason, the arc targets succeed, but all others fail miserably...  ) http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/packages/grid http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/packages/one_line_per_build Some of errors in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] umdns not listening on any interface (openwrt trunk)

2020-04-11 Thread Perry Couprie
When i try the following on openwrt trunk, it works: ubus call umdns set_config '{ "interfaces": [ "wan23,lan23" ] }' ubus call umdns set_config '{ "interfaces": [ "wan23,lan23" ] }' ubus call umdns set_config '{ "interfaces": [ "wan23,lan23" ] }' ubus call umdns set_config '{ "interfaces": [

[OpenWrt-Devel] umdns not listening on any interface (openwrt trunk)

2020-04-11 Thread Perry Couprie
Hi, I want to use umdns, but i found that it is not listening on any network interface. When starting umdns i get invalid command. On openwrt 19.07 it work, but in openwrt trunk not. I looked at the umdns script and i found the following line. ubus call umdns set_config '{ "interfaces": [

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] om-watchdog: Add support for GL-X1200 (GL.iNet)

2020-04-11 Thread Paul Fertser
Hi, On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:23:44PM +0800, guilin.wang wrote: > now the external single-chip cannot detect the level change of GPIO How often do you really need to feed the watchdog? Why do you have an additional MCU taking care of capturing the level change, what else is it doing? Can this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] build: config: allow bool to select a module pkg

2020-04-11 Thread Hannu Nyman
Petr Štetiar kirjoitti 11.4.2020 klo 12.43: Hannu Nyman [2020-04-11 09:00:11]: Hi, Applying the patch propsed here helped to fix my ath79 multi-device build. So can this be interpreted as your `Tested-by:` ? Thanks. -- ynezz Yes, it can. Hannu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] build: config: allow bool to select a module pkg

2020-04-11 Thread Petr Štetiar
Hannu Nyman [2020-04-11 09:00:11]: Hi, > Applying the patch propsed here helped to fix my ath79 multi-device build. So can this be interpreted as your `Tested-by:` ? Thanks. -- ynezz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] build: config: allow bool to select a module pkg

2020-04-11 Thread Hannu Nyman
Eneas U de Queiroz wrote at Thu Apr 9 17:39:17 PDT 2020: > This was reported to me here: > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/dcf3e63a35d05e7e5103819c0f17195bfafe9baa#commitcomment-38390450 > The update to kconfig-v5.6 broke TARGET_MULTI_PROFILE because it would not accept bool