Re: Release goals for 22.XX

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Spooren
> On 5. Oct 2021, at 12:33, Robert Marko wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 00:08, Paul Spooren wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> based on my overview[1] things are moving forward and being tested, >> great! What about the targets that did not see any 5.10 ambitions yet? >> Specifically: >> >> -

Re: Release goals for 22.XX

2021-10-05 Thread Robert Marko
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 00:08, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > based on my overview[1] things are moving forward and being tested, > great! What about the targets that did not see any 5.10 ambitions yet? > Specifically: > > - arc770 > - archs38 > - ath25 > - bcm47xx > - bcm4908 > - ipq807x I

Re: Release goals for 22.XX

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi all, based on my overview[1] things are moving forward and being tested, great! What about the targets that did not see any 5.10 ambitions yet? Specifically: - arc770 - archs38 - ath25 - bcm47xx - bcm4908 - ipq807x - layerscape - pistachio - uml Is anyone aware of people working on those

Re: [PATCH] realtek: do not hardcode restart handler and enable gpio-restart

2021-10-05 Thread Birger Koblitz
Hi, On 05/10/2021 22:59, Sander Vanheule wrote: One alternative could be to create some extra driver(s) in OpenWrt already, to get rid of setup.c (and prom.c at some later point) and work towards the upstream base for RTL838x/RTL839x. Anyone else with an opinion on this? That's a good idea.

Re: [PATCH] realtek: do not hardcode restart handler and enable gpio-restart

2021-10-05 Thread Sander Vanheule
Hi Paul, On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 16:35 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > Most boards supported by this target have a dedicated GPIO line > connected to SoC's /RESET to allow full clean reliable reboot. > > Use regular kernel notifier methods for default restart routines to > allow higher-priority

RE: [PATCH 4/4] zynq: switch to kernel 5.10

2021-10-05 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Luis Araneda > Sent: Sonntag, 3. Oktober 2021 17:35 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Luis Araneda > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] zynq: switch to kernel 5.10 > > Use kernel

[RFT 4/5] realtek: support D-Link DGS-1210-10P H/W:R1

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
This is an 8 port 1000BASE-T + 2 1000BASE-X SFP gigabit switch with PoE+ support, 65 W budget (using 54 V * 1.574 A = 85 W power supply). In order to manipulate the PoE+ one needs the realtek-poe package [0]. Specifications -- * SoC: Realtek RTL8380M 500 MHz MIPS 4KEc * Flash:

[RFT 5/5] realtek: support Trendnet TPE-082WS V1

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
According to photos and specs for Trendnet TPE-082WS V1.2R it should be the same as D-Link DGS-1210-10P R1 but with more powerful PSU (90 W) so the PoE budget is specified as 75 W. Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser --- .../realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 3 +

[RFT 3/5] realtek: add non-PoE version of DGS-1210-10 F1

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser --- .../rtl8380_d-link_dgs-1210-10-f1.dts | 8 +++ .../rtl8380_d-link_dgs-1210-10-f1.dtsi| 61 +++ .../rtl8380_d-link_dgs-1210-10p-f1.dts| 60 +- target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile | 10 ++- 4 files

[RFT 2/5] realtek: add all LEDs, buttons and SFP signals to DGS-1210-10

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
These GPIO numbers were obtained by physically inspecting a DGS-1210-10P R1 board but should be common for other devices based on same PCB layout. Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser --- .../dts-5.10/rtl8380_d-link_dgs-1210-10.dtsi | 88 +-- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 5

[RFT 1/5] realtek: split DGS-1210-10P DTS

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
In preparations to add support for more similar boards the common part is split into a DTSI. The model that's currently supported is known to be revision F1 so mark it accordingly and provide appropriate compatible string for sysupgrade to work. Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser --- ...0p.dts =>

[RFT 0/5] realtek: support boards similar to DGS-1210-10

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
I only have D-Link DGS-1210-10P R1 for testing but other devices should be very similar judging by the photos. Would be nice to share support for all the features available rather than get just R1 fully working. Paul Fertser (5): realtek: split DGS-1210-10P DTS realtek: add all LEDs, buttons

[PATCH][19.07] ar71xx: wix MikroTik wAP detection

2021-10-05 Thread Thibaut VARÈNE
MikroTik released a 3rd revision of that board, virtually identical to the previous one as far as software is concerned. Signed-off-by: Thibaut VARÈNE --- In case anyone still cares about ar71xx on 19.07, this one-liner keeps it working with MikroTik's latest minor revision of an otherwise

Re: Suggestion: Explicitly warn to not use GitHub web UI for patches

2021-10-05 Thread Rich Brown
> On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Paul D wrote: > > Write this up into an FAQ/howto on openwrt.org (this is, after all, the OWRT > way) Yes, it's always more powerful (and useful) to tell people what TO do, instead of what NOT to do. I contribute very occasionally, and by trial and error, I

RE: Suggestion: Explicitly warn to not use GitHub web UI for patches

2021-10-05 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
> -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Paul D > Sent: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 16:24 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Explicitly warn to not use GitHub web UI for patches > > Roughly > >

[PATCH uci v2] cmake: Allow override of install directories

2021-10-05 Thread Hauke Mehrtens via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Use the GNUInstallDirs include to

Re: OpenWrt imx split status?

2021-10-05 Thread @SRCHACK . ORG
Hi Tim-san, Piotr-san I have an on OpenWrt based buildroot with an i.MX8M mini board. Since I used linux-imx, uboot-imx. it is not a code that can be merged into the original master. It running for Japanese communication robot. start porting to i.MX8M on openwrt master? I want to help as much

Re: OpenWrt imx split status?

2021-10-05 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Piotr Dymacz wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On 04.10.2021 00:22, Tim Harvey wrote: > > Piotr, > > > > How is your progress regarding submitting patches to OpenWrt to split > > the imx target into multiple arch related subtargets (like cortexa7, > > cortexa9)? > > I'm

Re: OpenWrt imx split status?

2021-10-05 Thread Piotr Dymacz
Hi Tim, On 04.10.2021 00:22, Tim Harvey wrote: Piotr, How is your progress regarding submitting patches to OpenWrt to split the imx target into multiple arch related subtargets (like cortexa7, cortexa9)? I'm planning to clean it up and send patches this week. I finally got final revision of

Re: [PATCH uci] cmake: Allow overwrite of install directories

2021-10-05 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 10/2/21 2:41 PM, Paul D wrote: Overwrite or override? Seems like override - distinction here is important... Hi, I can change this to override, I am not a native speaker. Hauke ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: Suggestion: Explicitly warn to not use GitHub web UI for patches

2021-10-05 Thread Paul D
Roughly Write this up into an FAQ/howto on openwrt.org (this is, after all, the OWRT way) Link to it in a https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/troubleshooting-required-status-checks which looks

[PATCH] realtek: do not hardcode restart handler and enable gpio-restart

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
Most boards supported by this target have a dedicated GPIO line connected to SoC's /RESET to allow full clean reliable reboot. Use regular kernel notifier methods for default restart routines to allow higher-priority handlers (such as gpio-restart) to override it. Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser

Re: WDS stopped working in 21.02, bug is now fixed in netifd master

2021-10-05 Thread Daniel Haid
Hello everyone, I have made the bug reproducible by adding sleep(2) between the calls to nl80211_create_iface and linux_br_add_if in src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c of hostapd. In that way, I was able to observe (without the confusing random effects) that commit