> On 27/03/2024 10:53, Paul D wrote:
> >> lets make a vote
> >
> >
> > So... what's necessary for a vote to start?
> >
>
> Why this insistence on a vote while the discussion is still going on ?
> Why this interest in cut other people's opinion while there is stuff to
> be discussed and may change
Why this insistence on a vote while the discussion is still going on ?
Why this interest in cut other people's opinion while there is stuff to
be discussed and may change others idea.
It is not because a certain direction seems to be the way to go that a
discussion should be abruptly stopped
lets make a vote
So... what's necessary for a vote to start?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
[resent to list]
a) It's a policy change and not a code change. Policy changes require a
vote
Then take a(nother) vote.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-January/042063.html
b) Just because the kernel changed their interpretation of DCO
requirements doesn't mean
Christian and I have read on IRC people that got offended by my profile pic
People will take offence at *anything*. Thus, 'take' and not 'give'.
It's a *them* problem, not a *you* problem.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
>
> > My 2 cent on the problem of permitting nick is that if we accept that,
> > some funny guy might use nickname like "ExtraHardCockSucker"
> > and we wouldn't have anything to say about it and have to accept
> > it if the contribution is correct.
> >
> > Using Real name prevents that (on 99% of
My 2 cent on the problem of permitting nick is that if we accept that,
some funny guy might use nickname like "ExtraHardCockSucker"
and we wouldn't have anything to say about it and have to accept
it if the contribution is correct.
Using Real name prevents that (on 99% of the case)
Examples of
Il giorno mer 27 mar 2024 alle ore 13:33 Paul D ha scritto:
>
> > a) It's a policy change and not a code change.
> > Policy changes require a vote
>
> Then take a(nother) vote.
>
Honestly due to the conflicts, lets just take a vote and be done with it.
Members seem to participate more so it
a) It's a policy change and not a code change.
Policy changes require a vote
Then take a(nother) vote.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-January/042063.html
b) Just because the kernel changed their interpretation of DCO
requirements doesn't mean this automatically
