Hi all,
I'm trying to configure my openwrt project with xconfig. This fails with
the errors pasted to https://pastebin.com/LJvsAhab (too long to add,
summary below).
System is Mint 9.2 (Ubuntu Bionic based) with relevant Qt5 stuff
installed, including libqt5* (I installed all of them...) and
On 08/09/2014 04:13 AM, Weedy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Weedy wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to stop this? It started sometime in the
>> last 6months of trunk.
>> Right after this and couple minutes after boot my healing script fires
>> and detects that WAN is broken and ca
On 08/28/2014 12:10 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With latest git version, there is a build failure:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> find
> /home/peter/soft/wl-500gp/build_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-brcm47xx_generic/linux-3.14.16
>
Hi all,
When starting a clean build (21.02 branch) on a clean Fedora 33 machine,
I ran into the small issue of tools/autoconf failing to build. This was
due to perl-File-Compare missing. I apparently missed that prerequisite.
After installing said package, everything built fine.
Looking a
On 2021-02-24 15:36, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Schmutzler [mailto:m...@adrianschmutzler.de]
Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021 11:50
To: 'openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org'
Subject: Quilt and cutting down diff position lines
Hi,
as most are probably aware,
Hi,
Thanks for creating this patch. Got my X5000R today. Before flashing it
to OpenWRT, can you please tell me whether you (or anyone else) did
performance measurements with the original and the OpenWRT firmware?
I measured over 600mbit/s with WPA3 when on my desk, next to a notebook
with In
Hi,
On 3/13/21 3:21 AM, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 7:27 AM Bas Mevissen wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for creating this patch. Got my X5000R today. Before flashing it
to OpenWRT, can you please tell me whether you (or anyone else) did
performance measurements with the original
On 2020-07-30 09:13, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:17:28 +0200
wrote:
your dm-verity patchset is in our patchwork since November 2019 (v2).
Unfortunately, nobody seemed to be particularly interested in
reviewing/merging it.
Since I don't see a reason why this should c
On 2020-07-30 11:15, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bas Mevissen [mailto:ab...@basmevissen.nl]
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2020 10:54
To: Thomas Petazzoni
Cc: m...@adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto
On 2020-10-04 15:48, abnoeh wrote:
Few months ago there was some debate for how we handle certificate for
luci page: make user to click though certificate warning is not that
great for security so here is a proposal for autometically assign a
worldwide unique subdomain and how to make valid cert
On 2020-10-09 14:19, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
Hi all,
in master, we currently support kernels 5.4 and 4.19.
All targets build with 5.4 by default,
In other words: 4.19 is no longer required.
so 4.19 is just there and can
theoretically be used for regression testing
In that case, one can r
On 2020-10-09 14:33, abnoeh wrote:
20. 10. 9. 오후 8:29에 Bas Mevissen 이(가) 쓴 글:
So I think it is reasonably safe to do the initial setup over HTTP
(without the "S") at the first boot if there are no certificates
available from a previous OpenWRT install. Then the user can setup the
W
On 2020-10-11 00:58, Michael Richardson wrote:
Bas Mevissen wrote:
> A security conscious user/administrator would install a router
without any
> untrusted computers connected to the LAN side and setup the
device properly
> before allowing others to connect. The
On 2020-10-12 01:09, Paul Fertser wrote:
From: Gary Cooper
Device hardware: https://deviwiki.com/wiki/TP-LINK_AD7200_(Talon)
The Talon AD7200 is basically an Archer C2600 with larger flash, a
third PCIe lane and an 802.11ad radio. It comes in a different housing
reminiscent of the Archers C320
On 2020-10-12 11:40, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Bas Mevissen writes:
Nice work, but does it make sense to add a device that is already
EOL'ed by the manufacturer? I guess the installed base is also rather
small.
Definitely!
IMHO, it should me enough that there is one user with enough interes
On 2020-10-12 12:46, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:59:17AM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On 2020-10-12 11:40, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Bas Mevissen writes:
>
> > Nice work, but does it make sense to add a device that is already
> > EOL'ed by the manufacturer
On 2020-10-15 19:45, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Oct 15, 2020, at 11:32 AM, Daniel Golle
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:18:24AM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi,
I have a WLE600VX card in an APU4 running HEAD as of a week ago.
My /etc/config/wireless file is straightforward:
config
On 03/10/2017 02:21, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Why is http://www.openwrtsummit.org/ down for over 24h?
Site looks fine for me.
Bas.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwr
On 12/04/18 06:26, Arjav Parikh wrote:
Hi,
> (...)
Now as mentioned in previous mail only
at that two locations I see some process consuming lot of time.
Is it possible to reduce the time consumed by the process?
Isn't the long time between pre-init and ubi mount due to the lengthy
block
On 23/05/18 17:55, Arjen de Korte wrote:
Citeren Torbjörn Jansson :
(...)
But one thing that is a little anoying after the move is that for some
mails I get same thing twice and I'm not sure why.
Most likely because people are still cross-posting to lede-dev and
openwrt-devel (like you j
On 02/06/18 18:10, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
This make sit possible to store informations about a session and reuse
it later. When used by a server it increases the time to create a new
TLS session from about 1 second to less than 0.1 seconds.
...it *decreases* the time to...
The size of the ipk
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:25 +0800, Yongheng Qi wrote:
> anyone could tell me how to resolve the problem, I want NOT to change
> my kamikaze version.
> I used the kamikaze r19358.
>
Then find the change that fixed the issue and patch your setup yourself.
You cannot expect someone to fix your pro
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 10:12 +0800, Yongheng Qi wrote:
> Thanks Bas ,
>
>
> because kamikze trunk used linux kernel changed so faster. and my
> application depend on fixed kernel version.
>
You can keep the kernel version stable and have the other stuff up to
date. But that won't help if there is
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:04 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 09:33 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
>
> > Do you have access to an oscilloscope? It might be that the signal
level
> > or signal shape is not perfect. I've seen mixed results with various
> > serial to
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 16:56 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote:
> I looked closer at the PCB and it turned out that we have a voltage
> divider with two 5.6 kOhm to V_3_3 and GND (R613, R614) and a
> capacitor C496 (!) towards the CPU. The signal at the CPU looked fine
> for a 2.5V TTL.
> The voltage drift
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 22:37 +0100, Kövesdi György wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At last i could create symbolic backtrace (attached).
>
> The hardware is an Asus WL500GP-V2, a 160 Gb HD (on USB), a UVC webcam
> (Logitech Quickcam Sphere).
> The commandline is:
> mjpg-streamer -i "input_uvc.so -f 25 -r 320x24
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 15:30 +0100, Kövesdi György wrote:
> > Where is the output of mjpg-streamer written to? It looks like it is
> > using ram disk or (slow) flash memory. Make sure it is on the hard disk.
> Sorry, i forgot to mention that there is a link:
> /data -> /mnt/xxx/
> which point to the
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:23 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> It seems that the OpenWRT devs have entrenched views about optware packages:
>
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/944
>
What's your reason for digging up a 4 year old ticket?
Bas.
___
openwr
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:19:00 +0200, Filippo Sallemi
wrote:
> Hi,
> could someone explain how to change the order to install certain
packages?
>
> I need to overwrite some configuration files, but the system overrides
in
> alphabetical order.
>
Use the "files" directory in your OpenWRT root. Th
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:05:33 +0800, linux_pro wrote:
> SDK可能无法使用.
> 你需要svn co.
> 自己生成 工具链.
> 然后编译 你的 hello.
>
> 可以尝试下看看.
>
> 你碰到的问题我也没找到解决办法.
>
>
Can you please answer in English? Other people might profit from your
answers too.
Thanks,
--
Bas.
__
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:49:19 -0300, Antonio Grassi
wrote:
> It would be great if some OpenWRT developer could review it and send
some
> feedback about the inclusion of this patch; probably there are things to
be
> solved or improved before inclusion, so it would be great to hear about
> that
> t
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:53:19 -0300, Antonio Grassi
wrote:
> we tried a second approach, which
> is also included in the patch: instead of downloading deblobed kernel
> sources, we could deblob the vanilla kernel sources as part of the build
> process, making use of the "deblobing scripts" [1] pro
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:37:50 +0200, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>> In other words, I wonder why one would like to deblob. As long as you
>> don't install the blobs in the image, you are not using it. So if you
>> already downloaded it, what is the use of removing it above just not
>> installing and usi
Hi,
I took some stuff from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7649 to compile
gammu for OpenWRT on AVR32.
Most of it seems fine, but a few things fail:
- The compilation needs cmake on the host, which is not checked for.
OpenWRT does not provide support for cmake, but a host installed recent
cmake
On 08/16/2010 05:55 PM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I took some stuff from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7649 to compile
> gammu for OpenWRT on AVR32.
>
> Most of it seems fine, but a few things fail:
>
> - The compilation needs cmake on the host, which is not
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:05:21 -0700, Russell Senior
wrote:
> (...) but unfortunately, all the revisions I
> have tested after r22295 build okay but have failed to boot
> successfully. Currently, as of r23118, I lose the serial port very
> early in the boot, immediately after:
>
>From 23118 to 22
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:13:52 + (UTC), Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> Brian J. Murrell interlinx.bc.ca> writes:
>>
>> This simply updates shorewall-lite to the current 4.4.12.2
>
> I saw neither an ACK nor a NAK, nor do I see any sign that this was
> committed.
>
> Was there a problem with the sub
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:56:07 +0200, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> For the 'Marvell Orion' target the iptables package does not compile.
> See forum topic: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=117520
> Maybe for other targets as well?
>
> In short: the problem is that /usr/lib/libc is used while
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 09:51:13 -0800, Chris Li
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>
>> Both please.
>
> Here is the patch for the busybox sub tree.
> I haven't make it a patch in openwrt so that it will automatically apply
> when compile. Is there a good example how to
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:45:48 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:08 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote:
>> I guess something is wrong with your build environment. Clean it up and
>> please try again.
>
> I did (of course), several times in fact.
>
> Aft
(keeping the list in the loop)
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:56 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:45:48 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:08 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> > > I just did a build on backfire (revision 14012) for Orio
Hi all,
The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support. When
CONFIG_CMAKE is set in .config, the CMake tools will be build and
installed in staging_dir/host/bin.
To enable CONFIG_CMAKE, select "Advanced configuration options (for
developers) in the main menu and select "Build CMake
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:37:25 +0100, Jan Willies
wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> 2010/11/17 Bas Mevissen
> The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support.
>
> Thanks for your patch, I hope we can finally update Weechat (which
> kinda depends on cmake) to something r
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:49:46 +0100, Bas Mevissen
wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:37:25 +0100, Jan Willies
> wrote:
>> Hi Bas,
>>
>> 2010/11/17 Bas Mevissen
>> The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support.
>>
>> Thanks for your patch, I
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:32:36 +0100, Jan Willies
wrote:
> The CFLAGS from target/linux/kirkwood/Makefile are
> overriding include/host-build.mk [3]. So removing "include
> $(INCLUDE_DIR)/target.mk [4]" from tools/cmake/Makefile did it for me.
> Did you include it on purpose?
>
Ah, great. That i
Hi all,
The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support. When
CONFIG_CMAKE is set in .config, the CMake tools will be build and
installed in staging_dir/host/bin.
To enable CONFIG_CMAKE, select "Advanced configuration options (for
developers) in the main menu and select "Build CMak
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:18:52 +0100, Jan Willies
wrote:
> define Build/Configure
>
> cd $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)
> $(STAGING_DIR)/../host/bin/cmake .
> endef
>
The host bin dir is already in the path, so you should be able to call
cmake without defining a patch
We could also define $CM
On 11/18/2010 06:53 PM, Jan Willies wrote:
> Unfortunately cmake picks up the host-gcc:
>
> (cd
> /var/tmp/swjawill/openwrt-dockstar/build_dir/target-arm_v5te_uClibc-0.9.30.1_eabi/weechat-0.3.3;
> /var/tmp/swjawill/openwrt-dockstar/staging_dir/host/bin/cmake . || exit 1 );
> -- The C compiler id
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:51:22 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> Gr... Whatever I try it compiles now (even my own .config works)...
> Weird since there is nothing changed to the iptables package lately (or
> related things?).
>
> Only change I can think of is the update to Kubuntu 10.10 (from 10.04)
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:49:52 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the problem (compile errors are back):
> When building everything from scratch with
>
> make -j 9
>
> iptables does not compile. When building (with same .config file)
> without -j it builds fine.
>
> I also believe t
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:05 +0100, Mark Vels wrote:
> Please add at least a revision number in feeds.conf for anything else
> than bleeding edge! Time to grow up!
>
Yes, IMHO every OpenWRT tag and preferably every branch should contain a
feeds.conf file with revision numbers set for the trees i
Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3755 for a
fix for kmod-ebtables package not being built on 2.6.25+ kernels.
Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3756 for a
fix for a build error with kmod-i2c-core package on AVR32 2.6 kernels.
This might app
Bas Mevissen wrote:
> Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3755 for a
> fix for kmod-ebtables package not being built on 2.6.25+ kernels.
>
OK, comment here was the it would cause performance degradation. But is
that also the case when the ebtables module
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
> How will this affect performance (the opposite side of compression)?
> If it does, then it would be great if this would be selectable and not
> hardcoded.
>
> Just my two cents
> Maddes
>
> On 07.02.2010 17:44, edgar.sol...@we
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:25 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> Any idea how to measure boot time? I don't have serial console access. ede
>
some LED changing state, first respond to ping or wait for first
broadcast packet from ethernet (e.g. arp, dhcp) with wireshark.
Bas.
___
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:32 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>
> boottime should'nt be affected, because bootpartition is squashfs,
Ah, I use jffs2 as root (and only) fs on my dev boards.
> only the writeable partition is jffs2. In theory i vote for default to
> size-optimization and make it menuco
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 21:17 +0100, Mircea Gherzan wrote:
> The 1.4.0 tarball is no longer available upstream.
>
(..)
> PKG_NAME:=libconfig
> -PKG_VERSION:=1.4
> +PKG_VERSION:=1.4.2
> PKG_RELEASE:=1
>
> PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz
> PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://www.hyperrealm.com/
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 00:07 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Linux can hardly fit in a 2MB flash device, once you have opened the
> > Yes, but this text was written in the old times (2004?)
>
> I've been using OpenWRT on my WL-700gE for a while now. That machine
> has a 2MB flash, so OpenWRT is
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> The Asus WL520GC I just bought is running Linux. It has 2MB of flash.
Wow, I assumed that out of the box, these devices with a small amount of
flash did not run Linux. That was true in the past at least. Things have
changed since I last
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:14 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2010-02-19 2:53 PM, David Farrell wrote:
(..)
> > I just want to treat the OpenWrt system as a general purpose embedded linux
> > box.
> Two possibilities:
>
> a) You read about how the Linux kernel is cross compiled, how to build
> ex
On 02/19/2010 08:08 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I disagree with the way manufacturers typically set up board support
> packages. Often you have to install something as root, which is annoying
> for people that only have user accounts on some machines. Often you can
> only have one globally installe
On 02/21/2010 07:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> > Yes it is still supported and works well.
>> > It also contains a "relocatable" toolchain, so it doesn't matter where
>> > you unpack it. But it is only suitable for userspace software, iirc it
>> > does not ship with and is not capable of compil
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:30 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> On 28-02-10 11:28, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> > This patch allows multiple listen ports to be configured for dropbear in
> > /etc/config/dropbear. It renames the 'Port' option to 'Ports', so this
> > will break existing configs.
What looks more u
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:22 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> Since the above suggestion is OK for me, I'd suggest to just forget this
> patch :-)
The patch itself is useful if someone wants to explore the possibilities
of dropbear. There is a difference between two instances and one
instance which li
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 18:00 -0800, Andy Boyett wrote:
> *** BETA RELEASE ***
> The OpenWrt Team would like to announce a beta of the next major
> release, codenamed Backfire. Testing of this build will help refine
> the code in preparation of the final release.
>
Great!
> Binaries can be downlo
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:27 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> >
> > Highlights:
> > * brcm-2.4 updated to 2.4.37 kernel
>
> why not recent 2.4.39, the 2.4 kernel doesn't have major changes
> anymore
> but some more bugfixes
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.9
> h
On 03/05/2010 09:49 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Binaries can be downloaded at
>> http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03-beta/
>
> Is there some equivalent Svn revision, branch, or the trunk rev-number
> from which it was branched?
>
Looking at the .config files, it seems to be OpenWRT trun
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:31 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote:
>
> BTW, I get some garbled chars on TX (target -> PC) from the WR741ND on
> the serial line.
> Both in bootloader and Linux system, so I guess it's a hardware
> problem (especially
> as the log in
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 22:22 -0500, Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to split the toolchain out of my main openwrt build, after
> generating the toolchain i moved it to a new location from
> staging_dir/toolchain-powerpc_gcc-4.3.3_glibc-2.7 and set up and new
> build that points to
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 11:31 +0100, ulf kypke wrote:
> i'm still looking for a very good 3.3v serial adapter, the prolific is
> not the best one.
Best trick is to cascade a MAX3232 level shifter with 3V3 power supply.
It will raise the signal level to just over 5V. That is enough for the
average s
Hi Lorenzo,
Does this WPS patch set contain a way to mitigate the security design flaw?
Reading the Wikipedia article
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Protected_Setup#Security), it looks
to me a compatible fix should be possible.
Cheers,
Bas.
On 10/13/2012 01:39 PM, Lorenzo Cappelletti wro
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:28:13 +, Daniel Mierswa wrote:
KERNEL_MAKEOPTS := -C $(LINUX_DIR) \
- CROSS_COMPILE="$(KERNEL_CROSS)" \
+ CROSS_COMPILE="ccache $(KERNEL_CROSS)" \
ARCH="$(LINUX_KARCH)" \
KBUILD_HAVE_NLS=no \
CONFIG_SHELL="$(BASH)"
Is ccache manda
On 09/23/2014 09:36 AM, thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Thomas,
> I have to reject my own patch, uhttpd includes the header from ustream
> unconditionally,
> so the build dependency has to stay.
>
Can't you patch uhhtpd to conditionally include the header? Would be
something t
On 09/29/2014 04:32 PM, thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote:
> Hello Bas,
>
Hi Thomas,
(...)
>
> My goal was to have the build dependencies reduced for the case no ssl is
> enabled.
> And that was fixed now with the help of Felix.
> It was never an issue that the libraries were included to the i
On 09/30/2014 03:22 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I'll repeat the point for clarity: There is no inclusion of unused
> libraries going on here - at least not in the image or package repositories.
>
> uhttpd always needs the header of ustream-ssl, but it does not link
> against the library directly
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrt
0:07, John Crispin wrote:
On 07.04.21 12:16, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote:
Will Wifi 6 support be added to the interface? We have some support
for a couple of AX routers, so it would be nice if they can work
without manually tweaking things.
The underlying structure seems to support it alre
are checked on forehand.
Tested on a Fedora 33 and 34 (beta) that was freshly installed. Fedora appears
to
break up Perl modules into small packages that need to be installed for the
build to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Bas Mevissen
---
include/prereq-build.mk | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 i
are checked on forehand.
Tested on a Fedora 33 and 34 (beta) that was freshly installed. Fedora appears
to
break up Perl modules into small packages that need to be installed for the
build to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Bas Mevissen
---
include/prereq-build.mk | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 i
0 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
On 4/20/21 1:08 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
OpenWRT requires a number of Perl modules to be installed. It wasn't
checking on all of them.
This patch adds checks for Perl FindBin, File::Copy, File::Compare
and Thread::Queue modules.
Failing to install these, will have the
.
On 2021-04-29 22:39, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On 4/29/21 11:40 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
On 4/20/21 1:08 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
OpenWRT requires a number of Perl modules to be installed. It wasn't
checking on all of them.
This patch adds checks for Perl FindBin, File::Copy, File::Compare
an
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
(resent as previous attempt didn'
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
The g++ version 11.1.1
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
tldr; A recent upgrade of the w
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-05-16 23:57, Hauke Mehrte
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Pri
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
A few nitpicks:
On 2021-05-28 0
55, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
Hello Bas,
thank you for your review, please find my comments below.
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:41 AM Bas Mevissen
wrote:
On 2021-05-28 00:27, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
[skipped]
+static int rb4xx_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = n
c/WINDOWS/System32/Wbem:/mnt/c/WINDOWS/System32/WindowsPowerShell/v1.0/:/mnt/c/WINDOWS/System32/OpenSSH/:/mnt/c/Users/Bas
Mevissen/AppData/Local/Microsoft/WindowsApps:/mnt/c/Users/Bas
Mevissen/.dotnet/tools
It contains /mnt/c/Program Files/dotnet/ and other unquoted paths with
spaces. I would hav
5, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 07/06/21 22:35, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote:
It contains /mnt/c/Program Files/dotnet/ and other unquoted paths with
spaces. I would have expected them to be quoted or escaped, but none
of them seems to be the case.
(and shortening the path to a usual Linux
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 8/7/21 10:40 AM, Stijn Tinte
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-10-11 10:31, Bjoern Frank
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-10-11 10:31, Bjoern Frank
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-12-12 20:42, Jo-Philipp W
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 1/25/22 18:02, Stijn Tintel wr
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-04-21 00:21, Hauke Mehrte
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 13/05/2022 01:59, Sergey Rya
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 8/18/22 20:32, Robert Marko
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-09-13 21:56, Jo-Philipp W
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-01-20 13:24, Florian Ecke
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
