Le dimanche 9 mai 2010 06:10:37, Michael Evans a écrit :
Yes, that patch indeed solves my problem as well. Why isn't it in a
generic (all platforms) patch area?
Applied in r21408, I assume not that many models needed support for Samsung
flahs parts.
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:13 AM,
could you try if
trunk/target/linux/etrax/patches-2.6.32/200-samsung_flash.patch
fixes your issues ?
Quoting Michael J. Evans mjevans1...@gmail.com:
At LEAST
8MB flash: K8D6316UBM-PI07 Samsung Electronics 64M Bit
(8M x8/4M x16) Dual Bank NOR Flash Memory
memory falls in to the else
I can try it later tonight; ah I see, that's for a different arch.
This is a generic issue why wasn't that shared with all arches?
It may fix //my// issue, but shouldn't the right thing to do be to
accept any chip claiming basic CFI compliance?
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:13 AM, j...@phrozen.org
Looking at the printk my patch adds, the vendor EC (IIRC Samsung)
should match, but I see '0' and '0' for major and minor chars.
I think it's likely that the more specific patch will work, I'm
looking in to setting up a test now.
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Michael Evans
Yes, that patch indeed solves my problem as well. Why isn't it in a
generic (all platforms) patch area?
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:13 AM, j...@phrozen.org wrote:
could you try if
trunk/target/linux/etrax/patches-2.6.32/200-samsung_flash.patch
fixes your issues ?
Quoting Michael J. Evans
At LEAST
8MB flash: K8D6316UBM-PI07 Samsung Electronics 64M Bit
(8M x8/4M x16) Dual Bank NOR Flash Memory
memory falls in to the else statement. However it otherwise functions.
if (extp-MajorVersion != '1' ||
(extp-MinorVersion '0' || extp-MinorVersion '4')) {
if (cfi-mfr ==
