vel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti
> LiteBeam AC Gen2
>
> On 4/12/2019 15:37, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> > Current changes from Stijn's branch look fine, I've applied them to
> > the master clone from Dec 2nd, built
On 4/12/2019 15:37, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> Current changes from Stijn's branch look fine, I've applied them to
> the master clone from Dec 2nd, built and flashed; mac addresses are
> correct, ethernet is working as well as both wifi interfaces.
>
Can I get some [Ack|Review|Test]ed-by from you guys?
the network setup.) :-)
>
> Adrian
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stijn Tintel [mailto:st...@linux-ipv6.be]
>> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 13:33
>> To: Petr Štetiar ; Adrian Schmutzler
>>
>> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti LiteBeam
> AC Gen2
>
> On 3/12/2019 14:31, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> > Adrian Schmutzler [2019-12-03 13:17:04]:
> >
> >> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node
On 3/12/2019 14:31, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Adrian Schmutzler [2019-12-03 13:17:04]:
>
>> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node:
> Ok, I've checked only the parent node.
>
>> So, the question is whether it would make sense to remove the line for all
>> the other ubnt
Adrian Schmutzler [2019-12-03 13:17:04]:
> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node:
Ok, I've checked only the parent node.
> So, the question is whether it would make sense to remove the line for all
> the other ubnt-wa devices, too, then.
I would remove it, it d
Stijn Tintel [2019-12-03 14:03:16]:
> I've addressed this and added the MAC label in my staging tree:
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/stintel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lbe-5ac-gen2
Note, that this commit:
ath79: move IMAGE/factory.bin to Device/ubnt-wa
should be probably:
ath
omis...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti LiteBeam
> AC Gen2
>
> Hi,
>
> > > I used the same as with other ubnt-wa devices. I'm not really up to date
> > > on this metadata thing. Do we normally not include it in
Hi,
> > I used the same as with other ubnt-wa devices. I'm not really up to date
> > on this metadata thing. Do we normally not include it in factory images?
Indeed, but you've added following extra line to your device:
IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
Which me
On 3/12/2019 13:54, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
+ IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
>>> Can we reuse the IMAGE/factory.bin from Device/ubnt here? The only thing
>> missing compared to your line is append-metadata ...
>>
>> I used the same as with other ubnt-wa dev
> >> + IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
> > Can we reuse the IMAGE/factory.bin from Device/ubnt here? The only thing
> missing compared to your line is append-metadata ...
>
> I used the same as with other ubnt-wa devices. I'm not really up to date
> on this metad
nwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> >> Cc: pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
> >> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti
> >> LiteBeam AC Gen2
> >>
> >> On 3/12/2019 01:39, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> >>> Hi Stijn,
> >
i just checked mac addresses in the first image i built for this
device (r10011) and they are correct:
eth 18:E8:29:_device_specific
wlan5g 18:E8:29:_device_specific
wlan2g 1A:E8:29:_device_specific
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.ope
l.com
>> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti
>> LiteBeam AC Gen2
>>
>> On 3/12/2019 01:39, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
>>> Hi Stijn,
>>>
>>> does the device have a MAC address label or imprint on the box?
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stijn Tintel [mailto:st...@linux-ipv6.be]
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 00:58
> To: m...@adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for U
On 3/12/2019 01:39, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi Stijn,
>
> does the device have a MAC address label or imprint on the box?
It does.
>
> [...]
>
>> +define Device/ubnt_litebeam-ac-gen2
>> + $(Device/ubnt-wa)
>> + DEVICE_TITLE := Ubiquiti LiteBeam AC Gen2
> DEVICE_TITLE has been replaced b
Hi Stijn,
does the device have a MAC address label or imprint on the box?
[...]
> +define Device/ubnt_litebeam-ac-gen2
> + $(Device/ubnt-wa)
> + DEVICE_TITLE := Ubiquiti LiteBeam AC Gen2
DEVICE_TITLE has been replaced by DEVICE_VENDOR, DEVICE_MODEL and
DEVICE_VARIANT. In your case, I'd choos
Hardware:
* SoC: Atheros AR9342-BL1A
* RAM: 64MB DDR2 (Winbond W9751G6KB-25)
* Flash: 16MB SPI NOR (Macronix MX25L12835FZ2I-10G)
* Ethernet: 1x 10/100/1000 Mbps (Atheros AR8035-A) with 24V PoE support
* Wifi 2.4GHz: Atheros AR9340 v2
* WiFi 5GHz: Ubiquiti U-AME-G1-BR4A (rebranded QCA988X v2)
* LEDs
18 matches
Mail list logo
