Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2009-01-10 Thread john
claudio is getting access to svn so he can patch stuff and make it work. it'll take a few days to setup, but the decision has been made and i think he already sent credentials etc Quoting MichelinoK : > Any good news? > In the meanwhile, we've problems with those patches from Claudio due to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2009-01-10 Thread MichelinoK
Any good news? In the meanwhile, we've problems with those patches from Claudio due to the recent updates in the trunk of openwrt. I've trying to figure out which are the probs, but i'm not a linux expert :) ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-deve

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2009-01-07 Thread Claudio
Hi Hinko Koncevar many thanks for your reply. Today I test root=mtd1 but the result don't change. - VFS: Cannot open root device "mtd1" or unknown-block(0,0) Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions: Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2009-01-06 Thread Hinko Kocevar
Claudio wrote: > Hi all, > > today I try to quickly dump etrax to 2.6.28, I like to inform you of > this __partial__ work > > Atm you can obtain a loadable kernel but there are a lot of warning > and it get panic. > > Using svn revision 13875 you can apply the attached patch and obtain: > > Lin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2009-01-05 Thread Hinko Kocevar
georges.me...@wanadoo.fr wrote: > Hello all, > Cris image creation patch - objcopy on my machine creates 3Gb image without '-R .note.gnu.build-id' switch. hin...@alala /work/git/openwrt $ svn diff Index: include/kernel-defaults.mk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-29 Thread Georges Ménie
Hi Claudio, Thanks a lot for this ! >From what I have read in the doc, the way to submit patches is to send them to >this list, so it might explain why they were not included in the trunk... I am going to try your patches on the current trunk and see if they can be applied as is. Regards, Geo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-28 Thread Claudio
2008/12/27, j...@phrozen.org : > http://websvn.tuxfamily.org/listing.php?repname=crisos/svn&path=%2Ftarget%2Fdarwinfox%2Fpatches%2F&rev=0&sc=0 > > what are those patches ? > > Hi John, the patches that you can see there are diffs from openwrt to crisos. Please note that most of this patches has be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-27 Thread john
http://websvn.tuxfamily.org/listing.php?repname=crisos/svn&path=%2Ftarget%2Fdarwinfox%2Fpatches%2F&rev=0&sc=0 what are those patches ? Quoting Claudio : > Hi Georges > > 2008/12/26, Georges Ménie : >> Hi, >> >> You do not need this patch if your are running the crisos environment, >> it alread

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-27 Thread Claudio
Hi Georges 2008/12/26, Georges Ménie : > Hi, > > You do not need this patch if your are running the crisos environment, > it already has it, that's the way I found it: by comparing the sources. > I think it would be better to update the main stream (OpenWrt) so I send > a patch that have the minim

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-26 Thread Georges Ménie
Hi, You do not need this patch if your are running the crisos environment, it already has it, that's the way I found it: by comparing the sources. I think it would be better to update the main stream (OpenWrt) so I send a patch that have the minimum of change needed to make it work. About your tr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-25 Thread MichelinoK
ha scritto nel messaggio news:20081223152717.7guplewudk40s...@webmail.phrozen.org... > fantastic, > > i did the etrrax port a while back and thought it was broken :-) > > i will be home on the 2nd xmas day and will test/commit your fixes > > we should also consider bumping it to .27 or .28 > > T

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-25 Thread MichelinoK
Ok,just erverted to rev 13720, but I get error while patching the 100-compile_fixes.patch, dunno why, I a total noob on "patching" :( Anyway... after patching, have you tryed if usb sticks works? There's a "parallel" fork of kamikaze (www.crisos.org), it actually works, but it's very difficult fo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-25 Thread Georges Ménie
Hi, My patch should be applied as a regular patch, it does not replace the file 100-compile_fixes.patch but modify it to remove the specific compilation rules for misc.o and head.o So this is a patch on a patch, generated by svn diff... Regards, Georges MichelinoK a écrit : > Hi! > Sorry for t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-24 Thread MichelinoK
Hi! Sorry for the stupid question... Since there's already a patch with the name 100-compile_fixes.patch in the folder /target/linux/etrax/patches/, should i delete the existing patch and overwrite it ? (of course,deleting the first 4 lines of your patch and enabling broken platform from menucon

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-23 Thread Georges Ménie
Great ! I will provide some help, I still have to learn a lot about OpenWrt but the more I dig into it, the more I find it interesting ! Georges j...@phrozen.org a écrit : > fantastic, > > i did the etrrax port a while back and thought it was broken :-) > > i will be home on the 2nd xmas day a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-23 Thread john
fantastic, i did the etrrax port a while back and thought it was broken :-) i will be home on the 2nd xmas day and will test/commit your fixes we should also consider bumping it to .27 or .28 Thanks, John Quoting georges.me...@wanadoo.fr: > Hello all, > > Being new to this list, let me tell

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] enabling fox board

2008-12-23 Thread georges . menie
Hello all, Being new to this list, let me tell you how impressed I am with the work you have done ! I have a Fox board and found that it was already supported by OpenWrt, there is just a couple of modifications needed in order to have the image built and running on the board with the default bu