I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to
comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do would
be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt
complies with the GPL with regard to section 3, as I have no idea how
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:26 PM, bifferos wrote:
>
> as I have no idea how to >generate the packages in the snapshot from the
> files in the 'sources' area,
> and I haven't seen this documented anywhere.
I could not clearly understand what you mean, but here is my
understanding of the bui
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, harish badrinath wrote:
> Unless upstream ships binary blobs, freedom to demand
> "show me the
> code" is AFAIK satisfied.
I don't think you understood. I know how to build *a* version of OpenWrt. I
don't know how to build *the* version that created a snapshot.
The GPL s
On 20.09.2011 14:33, bifferos wrote:
> So how do I know what version of packages was pulled in at the time of
> building? I can assume the package source itself ends up in the 'dl'
> directory, so I can back that up so I have the pristine package source, but
> what about the patch set that was
On 20.09.2011 13:56, bifferos wrote:
>
> I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to
> comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do
> would be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt
> complies with the GPL
> I don't think you understood. I know how to build *a* version of
> OpenWrt. I don't know how to build *the* version that created a
> snapshot.
If you "simply" want to be GPL-compliant,
you can build your image and _then_ make
an archiv of the hole builddir. so you have
all downloaded sources f
> I don't think you understood. I know how to build *a* version of
> OpenWrt. I don't know how to build *the* version that created a
> snapshot.
If you "simply" want to be GPL-compliant,
you can build your image and _then_ make
an archiv of the hole builddir. so you have
all downloaded sources
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> Did you see the first sentences of e.g.
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03.1-rc5/README
That source revision wasn't my concern.
So let's see if I've got this right:
1) Check out correct revision as per instructions in release README
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> If you "simply" want to be GPL-compliant,
> you can build your image and _then_ make
> an archiv of the hole builddir. so you have
This is better than nothing, but I suspect won't fit on a single DVD :(. It is
also unpleasant for the recipient, fo
On 2011-09-20 5:08 PM, bifferos wrote:
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
If you "simply" want to be GPL-compliant,
you can build your image and _then_ make
an archiv of the hole builddir. so you have
This is better than nothing, but I suspect won't fit on a single DVD
:(. It is
> This is better than nothing, but I suspect won't fit on a single
> DVD :(. It is also unpleasant for the recipient, for instance they
i just tried to tar.bz2 my hole openwrt-dir including
staging + dl: it nearly fits on a CD...(800mb).
bye Bastian.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Is that it? I don't understand how the systems works out to pull in
> the correct feed version. I can understand how it works for tagged
> feeds, e.g. svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1
> but I don't get how it can work for
> s
Hi,
> I can understand how it works for tagged feeds, e.g.
> svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/branches/packages_10.03.1
hm, I think when you are using such a branch the result is still
not every time the same since changesets are still merged to
such a "stable" branch.
The only thing you could consi
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:07 +0200, Michael Heimpold wrote:
> The only thing you could consider stable is really a "tag", but
> for packages I can't find any tag?
It would be nice if there were a few more tags used for releases.
Thanks,
Conor
___
openwr
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> From: edgar.sol...@web.de
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance
> To: "OpenWrt Development List"
> Date: Tuesday, 20 September, 2011, 14:46
> On 20.09.2011 14:33, bifferos wrote:
> > So how do
--- On Tue, 20/9/11, Michael Heimpold wrote:
> From: Michael Heimpold
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance
> To: "OpenWrt Development List"
> Date: Tuesday, 20 September, 2011, 19:07
> Hi,
>
> > I can understand how it works for tagged feeds
16 matches
Mail list logo
