Well its also not a pressing issue for me. I just wanted to report it so it ends
up on a TODO list ;).
Henning
> Steven Barth hat am 9. April 2014 um 12:28 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Henning,
>
> yeah that is another side-effect of your - well - "irregular"
> ISP-behaviour. I will try to put it on th
Gert Doering writes:
> There has been quite a bit of discussion in the ISP camp regarding WAN
> IPv6 addresses. It's not actually straightforward what to do as an ISP,
> so multiple variants exist
>
> - RA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
> disadvantage: on PPPoE-type deployments, you need two pr
Hi Henning,
yeah that is another side-effect of your - well - "irregular"
ISP-behaviour. I will try to put it on the TODO but it's not very high
on the list as its more or less cosmetic, sorry I'm a little short on
time at the moment.
Cheers,
Steven
Hi Gert,
There has been quite a bit of discussion in the ISP camp regarding WAN
IPv6 addresses. It's not actually straightforward what to do as an ISP,
so multiple variants exist
- RA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
- DHCPv6-IA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
- "require use of an IPv6 addre
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
> Hi Gert,
> >>i find it very strange that your ISP doesn't offer public addresses on
> >>the WAN interface however I think this is actually standards compliant
> >>so we have to deal with it.
> >It's called "IPv4 exhaustion"... DS
Hi,
judging from Gerts mail domain he might well be stuck with the very
same provider i unfortunatelly signed a contract with. Small, local
German providers seem to be going for native ipv6 with dslite. That
allows them to grow even though they own a relatively small ipv4 pool.
Most users are prob
I am not an ipv6 expert at all but from what i understand it has to do
with the providers configuration that my "wan6" does not actually have
a routeable ipv6 addr.
On a subject related to that dslite setup i found another problem. I am
not sure what i am supposed to see on the overview page of lu
Hi Gert,
i find it very strange that your ISP doesn't offer public addresses on
the WAN interface however I think this is actually standards compliant
so we have to deal with it.
It's called "IPv4 exhaustion"... DS-Lite is one of the way to deal
with it (which effectively gives you "only one NA
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:22:45AM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
> i find it very strange that your ISP doesn't offer public addresses on
> the WAN interface however I think this is actually standards compliant
> so we have to deal with it.
It's called "IPv4 exhaustion"... DS-Lite is one of t
Hey Steven,
thanks for the patch, it works with just peeraddr and proto in the
config. And it confirms that hours of trying to get my config right
where nothing but learning time ;).
regards,
Henning
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:22:45 +0200
Steven Barth wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> i find it very st
Hello Henning,
i find it very strange that your ISP doesn't offer public addresses on
the WAN interface however I think this is actually standards compliant
so we have to deal with it.
please see: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/40422
I added an option "weakif" which allows you to specify a
Hi,
i set up an openwrt router a few days ago. My provider offers native
IPv6 and v4 is available via a dslite tunnel. I ran into trouble
setting it up according to the available documentation and decided to
get a trunk image first. Now my router runs a trunk image with version
(Bleeding Edge, r40
12 matches
Mail list logo
