On 2009.06.28. 22:29:45 Mattia Aracne wrote:
>> Sotware floating point emulation is now enabled by default for mips and
>> mipsel
>> and the kernel FPU emulator is disabled by default with changesets 16605 and
>> 16606.
>> --
>> Best regards, Florian Fainelli
>> Email : flor...@openwrt.org
>> ht
> Sotware floating point emulation is now enabled by default for mips and
> mipsel
> and the kernel FPU emulator is disabled by default with changesets 16605 and
> 16606.
> --
> Best regards, Florian Fainelli
> Email : flor...@openwrt.org
> http://openwrt.org
Applying this patches broke ADM
Le Monday 22 June 2009 10:02:31 Florian Fainelli, vous avez écrit :
> Le Sunday 21 June 2009 01:04:05 Jonas Gorski, vous avez écrit :
> > 2009/6/21 Michael Buesch :
> > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > >> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> > >> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:
Le Sunday 21 June 2009 01:04:05 Jonas Gorski, vous avez écrit :
> 2009/6/21 Michael Buesch :
> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> >> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> >> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> >> >> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly
Hi,
I have one further suggestion.
I have HAVE a DUAL mips3 with 64 megabytes of ram RUNNING on an FPGA.
However, mips3 has a VERY small instruction set. So far I haven't been
able to get the kernel to run AT ALL. The reason is because some of the
more elegant MIPS instructions are used
2009/6/21 Michael Buesch :
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
>> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> >> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to
>> >> > waste space.
>> >>
>> >> I would be very s
On Saturday 20 June 2009 23:56:51 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> 2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> > On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> >> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to
> >> > waste space.
> >>
> >> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kern
2009/6/20 Michael Buesch :
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to waste
>> > space.
>>
>> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kernel emulated
>> floating point operation results in an exception an
On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:09:56 Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > If we do _not_ gain performance, it certainly is not a good idea to waste
> > space.
>
> I would be very surprised if we wouldn't. Every kernel emulated
> floating point operation results in an exception and the appropriate
> handling (fpu
2009/6/19 Michael Buesch :
> On Friday 19 June 2009 18:20:53 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
>> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
>> > > Michael Buesch wrote:
>> > > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu caste
On Friday 19 June 2009 18:20:53 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> > > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
>
Le Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:10:05 Dan Brown, vous avez écrit :
> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> >> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft
Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
> On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-flo
> On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
>> Michael Buesch wrote:
>> > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-float".
>> >> The cpu doesn't have fpu and the current floating code get em
On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-float".
> >> The cpu doesn't have fpu and the current floating code get emulated b
On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-float".
> The cpu doesn't have fpu and the current floating code get emulated by the
> kernel emulator instead of using the gcc emulation support (that is cheaper
> because
Hi Matthieu,
Le Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-float".
> The cpu doesn't have fpu and the current floating code get emulated by the
> kernel emulator instead of using the gcc emulation support (t
Hi,
I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-float".
The cpu doesn't have fpu and the current floating code get emulated by the
kernel emulator instead of using the gcc emulation support (that is cheaper
because there is no kernel trap).
Matthieu
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
