Hi Birger,
On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 11:40 +0200, Birger Koblitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19.06.22 10:56, Sander Vanheule wrote:
>
> > - h->cpu_tag[1] = h->cpu_tag[2] = 0;
> > - if (prio >= 0)
> > - h->cpu_tag[2] = BIT(13) | prio << 8; // Enable and set
> > Priority Queue
> > +
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 19.06.2022 11:56, Sander Vanheu
Hi,
On 19.06.22 10:56, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> - h->cpu_tag[1] = h->cpu_tag[2] = 0;
> - if (prio >= 0)
> - h->cpu_tag[2] = BIT(13) | prio << 8; // Enable and set Priority
> Queue
> + h->cpu_tag[1] = 0;
> + /* Enable (AS_QID) and set Priority Queue (QID) */
> + h-
Destination switch ports for outgoing frame can range from 0 to
CPU_PORT-1, and frame priorities should also always be positive.
Refactor the code to only generate egress frame CPU headers when the a
valid destination port number is available, and make the code a bit more
consistent between differ
