On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 03:44:57AM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:26:04PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > Each hypervisor will have a small set of drivers guaranteed to be
> > present. These though will be completely different between hypervisors.
>
> Do you
On 11/13/23 21:49, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:54:34PM +, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Paul Spooren [2023-11-13 13:30:10]:
Hi,
How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard, an
extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
FYI that pull
David Bauer [2023-11-14 10:02:36]:
Hi,
> Is there already a patch series / PR in the works?
AFAIK there is just PR #13924 attempting to workaround #13886
> Otherwise, I'd look into that.
Great, thanks!
Cheers,
Petr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi Daniel,
Hi Petr,
On 11/13/23 21:49, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:54:34PM +, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Paul Spooren [2023-11-13 13:30:10]:
Hi,
How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard, an
extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:44 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 03:44:57AM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:26:04PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 03:44:57AM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:26:04PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How about we
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard,
>>> an extended and a
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:26:04PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> > >
> > > How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard,
> > > an
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> >
> > How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard,
> > an extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
> >
> > What packages
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:54:34PM +, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Paul Spooren [2023-11-13 13:30:10]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard,
> > an extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
>
> FYI that pull request added 27 firmware
Paul Spooren [2023-11-13 13:30:10]:
Hi,
> How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard, an
> extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
FYI that pull request added 27 firmware ASIC blobs, thus increased x86/64
image from 10 MiB to 41 MiB, but actually
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard, an
> extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
>
> What packages specifically is another discussion but the approach could be
>
Hi all,
How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard, an
extended and a virtual firmware for the x86/64 target?
What packages specifically is another discussion but the approach could be that
standard contains all kmods to get network working on all device, extended
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 5:19 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> On 2023-09-14, Paul Spooren wrote:
>>
>> I’d like to merge the PR which adds the Mellanox Spectrum SN2100 to
>> OpenWrt[1]. In its current state a new x86 image would be added next
>> to the generic x86 image. Another approach
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 5:19 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 2023-09-14, Paul Spooren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to merge the PR which adds the Mellanox Spectrum SN2100 to
>> OpenWrt[1]. In its current state a new x86 image would be added next
>> to the generic x86 image.
Hi,
> I'd suggest to stick to a single x86_64 image for maintenance and testing
> reasons alone
I agree. Furthermore, x86 devices have often no device identity like other
devices using device tree do. With the current implementation, the attended
sysupgrade service would be broken since on
Hi
On 2023-09-14, Paul Spooren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to merge the PR which adds the Mellanox Spectrum SN2100 to
> OpenWrt[1]. In its current state a new x86 image would be added next
> to the generic x86 image. Another approach is to add all related
> packages to the default image. Either
Hi,
I’d like to merge the PR which adds the Mellanox Spectrum SN2100 to OpenWrt[1].
In its current state a new x86 image would be added next to the generic x86
image. Another approach is to add all related packages to the default image.
Either way creates a working image.
I remember that
18 matches
Mail list logo
