On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 08:15:15PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > On Jun 14, 2025, at 3:33 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >>> On Jun 13, 2025, at 5:01 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:03:37PM -0600, Philip Prindeville via
> >>> openwrt-devel wrote:
> Should the BPi-
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
> On Jun 14, 2025, at 3:33 AM, D
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 09:00:31PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 2025, at 5:01 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:03:37PM -0600, Philip Prindeville via
> > openwrt-devel wrote:
> >>
> >> Should the BPi-R4 be more richly provisioned? It's got 4 or
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
> On Jun 13, 2025, at 5:01 PM, D
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:03:37PM -0600, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
wrote:
>
> Should the BPi-R4 be more richly provisioned? It's got 4 or 8GB of DRAM so
> it's hardly a "skinny" platform.
I would leave that to the user and keep the default image with just what
is necessary. Divergi
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Should the BPi-R4 be more richly p
