Hello Bastian,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:11 PM Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> I'am also an infrequent user. I do not see an issue
> for the moment, it compiles and runs just fine:
Thank you for taking care of testing it, one less problem.
--
Sergey
___
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:23:16PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I haven't used the UML target in the past year, but I have used it a lot
> before.
> The ability to do hostfs mounts is very nice.
> If it went away, I'd be sad, it's not a disaster as you say.
I'am also an infrequent user. I
I haven't used the UML target in the past year, but I have used it a lot
before.
The ability to do hostfs mounts is very nice.
If it went away, I'd be sad, it's not a disaster as you say.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:17 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> On 10/8/21 5:54 AM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:05 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
>>> as previously posted on GitHub[1] I'd like to remove the UML target
>>> since it seems broken, isn't offered by our buildbots and it's
On 10/8/21 5:54 AM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
Hello Paul,
thank you for posting this to ML.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:05 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
as previously posted on GitHub[1] I'd like to remove the UML target
since it seems broken, isn't offered by our buildbots and it's purpose
for
Hello Paul,
thank you for posting this to ML.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:05 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> as previously posted on GitHub[1] I'd like to remove the UML target
> since it seems broken, isn't offered by our buildbots and it's purpose
> for testing can be replaced by using qemu.
>
> Is
Hi,
as previously posted on GitHub[1] I'd like to remove the UML target
since it seems broken, isn't offered by our buildbots and it's purpose
for testing can be replaced by using qemu.
Is anyone here actively using UML and would like to keep it?
Best,
Paul
[1]:
