Re: [Operators] Openfire 3.6.4 (jabber.iitsp.com) vs. jabber.org

2010-07-06 Thread Jesse Thompson
On 07/06/2010 10:24 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Tue Jul 6 15:53:11 2010, Jesse Thompson wrote: I haven't looked into prosody. ejabberd is the best option, that I am aware of, for hosting lots of virtual domains (although it would be nice if they added the ability to add domains on the fly witho

Re: [Operators] Openfire 3.6.4 (jabber.iitsp.com) vs. jabber.org

2010-07-06 Thread Dave Cridland
On Tue Jul 6 15:53:11 2010, Jesse Thompson wrote: I haven't looked into prosody. ejabberd is the best option, that I am aware of, for hosting lots of virtual domains (although it would be nice if they added the ability to add domains on the fly without requiring a restart of the server.)

Re: [Operators] Openfire 3.6.4 (jabber.iitsp.com) vs. jabber.org

2010-07-06 Thread Jesse Thompson
On 07/03/2010 04:14 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: I also had doubts about using a "scripting language" for such a big project. Suffice to say that over the past couple of years my doubts are well and truly gone:) In fact I find the definition of "scripting language" rather vague now. Yeah, "scriptin

Re: [Operators] Openfire 3.6.4 (jabber.iitsp.com) vs. jabber.org

2010-07-06 Thread Jesse Thompson
On 07/05/2010 08:06 AM, Nigel Kukard wrote: The Openfire guys might want to work on a fix, though, since it's quite useful to have server-side. Openfire hasn't seen much activity since it moved out of focus of Jive Software's business goals. The latest release is from May 1, 2009, and it cont