"We owe it to our user's to provide secure communications" - St Peter.
To achieve ubiquitous encryption between clients and servers on XMPP, we're
doing a phased approach similar to the ipv6 test days.
- 4th January is the first test day of full XMPP encryption. The aim -
see what breaks wh
<
said:
> Thanks for the note. When I did some research into DNSSEC support
> earlier this year, the registrars I found were Gandi, Trans IP, and
> Names Beyond. At that time I also discovered that our friends at
> Flosoft also support DNSSEC. Now I can add InterNetX to the list of
> providers I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/13 8:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I found:
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/
Yes,
>
we know some of those Deploy360 folks. Dan York has taken an
interest in what the XMPP community is doing here.
Pe
I found:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/
And also:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/dnssec/deployment
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> >I'd support that.
>
> Do I have to pay some extra stuff for it?
Nope, from their perspective a domain name is a domain name and you get
everything (including use of their DNS servers!). No nickle and diming
for stuff like whois m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
>>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries
>>> the various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org
>>> sig
On 20.11.2013 15:43, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
>>>
>>> I'll throw in a good word f
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed.
:)
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I'll throw in a good word for Gandi (www.gandi.net). I finished
moving
my domains over t
Hi,
El 2013-11-20 12:46:07, Rafał Zawadzki escribió:
> when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I don't know if they offer services to customers in other countries.
But I have very good experience with InterNetX (http://www.internetx.de/)
here in Germany.
Not just with DNSsec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/11/2013 11:46, Rafa? Zawadzki wrote:
>
>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
>> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> when you have reliable good one - please
On 20.11.2013 13:19, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
>>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
>>> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> when you have reliabl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> >That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
> >various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I'll th
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
Hi Peter,
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
--
Rafal bluszcz Zawadzki http://dev.bluszcz.net
https://jabberpl.org - XMPP serv
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió:
> > I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking
> > about DNSSEC, too.
>
> Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again:
> for
Hi Dave,
El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió:
> I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking
> about DNSSEC, too.
Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again:
for .im the problem is not to find a registrar, that supports DNSsec.
The .i
Let me see, how many copies of that text do I have already?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
> signed with DNSSEC:
>
> http://xm
Hmmm...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
> signed with DNSSEC:
>
> http://xmpp.net/reports.php#dnssecsrv
>
> That's good progre
17 matches
Mail list logo