[Operators] 4th Jan - XMPP encryption day 01

2013-11-20 Thread Simon Tennant
"We owe it to our user's to provide secure communications" - St Peter. To achieve ubiquitous encryption between clients and servers on XMPP, we're doing a phased approach similar to the ipv6 test days. - 4th January is the first test day of full XMPP encryption. The aim - see what breaks wh

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Thanks for the note. When I did some research into DNSSEC support > earlier this year, the registrars I found were Gandi, Trans IP, and > Names Beyond. At that time I also discovered that our friends at > Flosoft also support DNSSEC. Now I can add InterNetX to the list of > providers I

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/13 8:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > I found: > > http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/ Yes, > we know some of those Deploy360 folks. Dan York has taken an interest in what the XMPP community is doing here. Pe

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Dave Cridland
I found: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/ And also: http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/dnssec/deployment On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote: > >I'd support that. > > Do I have to pay some extra stuff for it? Nope, from their perspective a domain name is a domain name and you get everything (including use of their DNS servers!). No nickle and diming for stuff like whois m

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote: >>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries >>> the various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org >>> sig

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On 20.11.2013 15:43, Rafał Zawadzki wrote: > That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the > various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) > when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts. >>> >>> I'll throw in a good word f

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Rafał Zawadzki
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts. I'll throw in a good word for Gandi (www.gandi.net). I finished moving my domains over t

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Matthias Wimmer
Hi, El 2013-11-20 12:46:07, Rafał Zawadzki escribió: > when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts. I don't know if they offer services to customers in other countries. But I have very good experience with InterNetX (http://www.internetx.de/) here in Germany. Not just with DNSsec

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Moonchild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/11/2013 11:46, Rafa? Zawadzki wrote: > >> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the >> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) > > Hi Peter, > > when you have reliable good one - please

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On 20.11.2013 13:19, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote: >>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the >>> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> when you have reliabl

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote: > >That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the > >various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) > > Hi Peter, > > when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts. I'll th

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Rafał Zawadzki
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :) Hi Peter, when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts. -- Rafal bluszcz Zawadzki http://dev.bluszcz.net https://jabberpl.org - XMPP serv

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Dave Cridland
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Matthias Wimmer wrote: > Hi Dave, > > El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió: > > I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking > > about DNSSEC, too. > > Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again: > for

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Matthias Wimmer
Hi Dave, El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió: > I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking > about DNSSEC, too. Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again: for .im the problem is not to find a registrar, that supports DNSsec. The .i

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Crystal Verner
Let me see, how many copies of that text do I have already? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records > signed with DNSSEC: > > http://xm

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

2013-11-20 Thread Crystal Verner
Hmmm... Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records > signed with DNSSEC: > > http://xmpp.net/reports.php#dnssecsrv > > That's good progre