Here is what I sent...
###
Dear Domicilium,
Now that DNSSEC is being more widely deployed, would you more strongly
consider deploying it at the .im TLD? I contacted you about this a
number of years ago and at that time you said it was under
consideration. The .im TLD is very widely used for
i can post in my site with a form or a button for send an e-mail to .im
authorities
have you any ideas for e-mail text?
2016-02-01 16:03 GMT+01:00 A :
> Really needed endeavour. Dropped email to the .im authorities. By the way,
> owners of services with websites should also make a post or someth
Really needed endeavour. Dropped email to the .im authorities. By the
way, owners of services with websites should also make a post or
something to tell users, that it is possible to convince .im authorities
to enable DNSSEC.
In the end of the day, the users will ultimately benefit from DNSSEC
Currently, DNSSEC is not supported for .IM-based domains because of lack
of support on the side of .IM TLD operator.
In reply to my request, the operator has expressed some interest, and
asked other interested domain owners to email them to special mailbox
dns...@nic.im . The more public interest,
<
said:
> Thanks for the note. When I did some research into DNSSEC support
> earlier this year, the registrars I found were Gandi, Trans IP, and
> Names Beyond. At that time I also discovered that our friends at
> Flosoft also support DNSSEC. Now I can add InterNetX to the list of
> providers I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/13 8:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I found:
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/
Yes,
>
we know some of those Deploy360 folks. Dan York has taken an
interest in what the XMPP community is doing here.
Pe
I found:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/resources/dnssec-registrars/
And also:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/dnssec/deployment
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> >I'd support that.
>
> Do I have to pay some extra stuff for it?
Nope, from their perspective a domain name is a domain name and you get
everything (including use of their DNS servers!). No nickle and diming
for stuff like whois m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/13 5:19 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
>>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries
>>> the various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org
>>> sig
On 20.11.2013 15:43, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
>>>
>>> I'll throw in a good word f
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed.
:)
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I'll throw in a good word for Gandi (www.gandi.net). I finished
moving
my domains over t
Hi,
El 2013-11-20 12:46:07, Rafał Zawadzki escribió:
> when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I don't know if they offer services to customers in other countries.
But I have very good experience with InterNetX (http://www.internetx.de/)
here in Germany.
Not just with DNSsec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/11/2013 11:46, Rafa? Zawadzki wrote:
>
>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
>> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> when you have reliable good one - please
On 20.11.2013 13:19, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
>>> That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
>>> various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> when you have reliabl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
> >That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
> >various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
I'll th
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org signed. :)
Hi Peter,
when you have reliable good one - please share your thoughts.
--
Rafal bluszcz Zawadzki http://dev.bluszcz.net
https://jabberpl.org - XMPP serv
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió:
> > I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking
> > about DNSSEC, too.
>
> Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again:
> for
Hi Dave,
El 2013-11-19 17:04:44, Dave Cridland escribió:
> I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking
> about DNSSEC, too.
Probably it's what you meant. I just want to point this out again:
for .im the problem is not to find a registrar, that supports DNSsec.
The .i
Let me see, how many copies of that text do I have already?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
> signed with DNSSEC:
>
> http://xm
Hmmm...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
> signed with DNSSEC:
>
> http://xmpp.net/reports.php#dnssecsrv
>
> That's good progre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/13 10:04 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today
> asking about DNSSEC, too.
Yes, I do that at least once a year. So far, they have always told me
something like "it's on our roadmap but
I dropped a mail to the Domicilium people who look after .im today asking
about DNSSEC, too.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
> signed with DNSSEC:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It appears that more XMPP services are getting their DNS records
signed with DNSSEC:
http://xmpp.net/reports.php#dnssecsrv
That's good progress! I'll need to investigate which registries the
various .org domains are using so that I can get jabber.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
