Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Great! Thanks a lot Tim! I did not know that APEX worked, because the test that is in SFC repo explicitly checks for the INSTALLER_TYPE, and it fails if it is not 'fuel'. Happy to see that it works with other installers as well. Cheers, Juan On jue, 2017-01-26 at 15:03 -0500, Tim Rozet wrote:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [tech-discuss][fuel]

Hi Fuel@OPNFV- and OPNFV colleagues! As I have been assigned a new position within my company, I have decided to step down as a committer in the OPNFV@Fuel project. The OPNFV journey to where we stand now has been really thrilling to me, and I have experienced a lot of great and innovative time wi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Weekly meeting for KVM enhancements for NFV on 1/26/2017 is CANCELLED

___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Hi Bryan Hope my inline responses are still readable … Thanks. Wenjing From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L [mailto:bs3...@att.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:29 AM To: Wenjing Chu ; Pierre Lynch ; Jose Lausuch Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Hi Juan, Thanks I didn't know about the --compress option. I uploaded the compressed one (~ 400MB) to: artifacts.opnfv.org/sfc/random/sfc_cloud.qcow2 Just FYI Fuel isn't the only installer that works with SFC, Apex also works. That particular sfc_cloud image has the updated vxlan tool that wil

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

Sounds good to me. Thanks Aaron and Maryam! Carlos On 26 Jan 2017, at 20:23, Aaron Smith mailto:aasm...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, Maybe we could dedicate a portion of an upcoming Barometer meeting to discuss and put together talking points for a longer meeting? We have been encourage by the ali

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Hi Tapio Think of these patches as a place to review the proposed test cases. It does not imply that the submitter believes it’s already approved. If a yardstick test case may be falling into performance area and shouldn’t be included in your opinion, I would provide that comment in gerrit. The

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Hi, Looks like the merge job is doing the wrong thing. its checking out the patchset, rather than what is in master. since the patchset is from Dec 28, and does not touch ./docs/requirements/05-implementation.rst (which has been updated since then) git does not see a conflict with merging this co

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Hi, Looks like the merge job is doing the wrong thing. its checking out the patchset, rather than what is in master. since the patchset is from Dec 28, and does not touch ./docs/requirements/05-implementation.rst (which has been updated since then) git does not see a conflict with merging this co

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

Hi, Maybe we could dedicate a portion of an upcoming Barometer meeting to discuss and put together talking points for a longer meeting? We have been encourage by the alignment that has been happening within the Barometer project. (VES and the telemetry / event definition work) Aaron On Thu, Jan

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

More comments inline. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:00 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; Pierre Lynch ; Jose Lausuch Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area Thanks

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 10am to 11am on Thursday (CDT) (ulrich.kle...@huawei.com)

anyone successful on being the host? I for some reason can't get in as host. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ulrich Kleber wrote: > Hi, > do we have the meeting today? > There is nobody on the bridge or in IRC. > Cheers, > Uli > > -Original Appointment- > *From:* m...@linuxfoundation.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Folks I can't login as organizer for some reason - go to the IRC polestar

-- Margaret Chiosi ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 10am to 11am on Thursday (CDT) (ulrich.kle...@huawei.com)

Hi, do we have the meeting today? There is nobody on the bridge or in IRC. Cheers, Uli -Original Appointment- From: m...@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:m...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Friday, 20 January, 2017 16:16 To: m...@linuxfoundation.org; hkirk...@linuxfoundation.org; jonne.soini...@no

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker Plugin MIssing From Danube Nightly ISO

Serg - I would be happy to help test Tacker whichever release it goes into. Same with Congress. aimee On 01/25/2017 06:43 PM, Serg Melikyan wrote: > Hi Aimee, > > indeed tacker is not included in Fuel Danube right now, building and > including this plugin was disabled >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

Hi Folks On the barometer side, we’ve been looking and actively contributing to collectd to collect system statistics and to enable the monitoring of Events and metrics for the NFVI, with the goal of leveraging the features it has under the topics you men

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-docs] References in documentation to master or release files?

Hello Docs team, I was wondering if any decision has been made...? Personally I'm for option A. Thanks, Carlos From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: 19 January 2017 09:33 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@l

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Dear all, Sorry for another email on this issue: Today the situation is even more strange: There is the old alarm table in generated artifacts file: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/index.html But the git tree still contains the new table: https://git.opnfv.org/doctor/tree/d

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] [releng][opnfvdocs] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Dear all, Sorry for another email on this issue: Today the situation is even more strange: There is the old alarm table in generated artifacts file: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/index.html But the git tree still contains the new table: https://git.opnfv.org/doctor/tree/d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re: [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Dear all, So this issue is easily reproducible. It had again happened today with another patch being merged https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/24365 We are now back to the old table again :( We have to find a solution to this problem!!! Best regards, Gerald -Original Message- From:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re: [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Dear all, So this issue is easily reproducible. It had again happened today with another patch being merged https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/24365 We are now back to the old table again :( We have to find a solution to this problem!!! Best regards, Gerald -Original Message- From:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Weekly Call

Oops, wrong thread. I was sending to the meeting notification for TestPerf meeting not VSPERF. Sorry for that. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:21 PM Christo Kleu wrote: > Good day Yujun, > > I was also not able to attend yesterdays meeting. > > VSPERF Project Meetings (link >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Juan, please ping me in IRC and I'll do it for you. - Jose - -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Buil Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 18:49 PM To: Juan Vidal ALLENDE; opnfv-tech-disc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

Hi Aaron and Doctor team, Those are indeed very interesting areas, for some of the topics in the list, I’d like to point you to the OpNFV VES project(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/ves), which, imo, share some common interests in terms of agent based data collections, common event models, etc.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Hi Tim, Did you use the '--compress' option? Here are my results: -rw-r--r-- 1 ejuavid eusers 2,4G ago 5 14:50 sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot1,6G ene 26 09:11 sf_nsh_colorado.sparse.nocompress.qcow2 -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot559M ene 23 12:37 sf_nsh_colorado.sparse.q