[opnfv-tech-discuss] [anteater] build log for anteator

I notices a warning on license header in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/36839/ [image: Screen Shot 2017-07-12 at 11.03.55 AM.png] However the build log is not posted. It's OK for now since the failure is clear enough. But it would be nice to have the build log as well as other CI jobs. --

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Draft support for presentation to TSC

Hi Dave, Sorry to jump into the discussion here! In the proposal, if I may clarify, "N-1 release" means at least from N-1.1.0 and not after N-1.3.0. So we are not dealing things out of date. Also, stress testing against "N-1 release" does not necessarily mean there will be unconstrained

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]stepping down from PTL

Thank you Goutham for your great contribution in Kingbird/multi-site development! Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Goutham Pratapa [pratapagout...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 July 2017 9:30 To: joehuang Cc: Chigang (Justin); opnfv-tech-discuss Subject: Re:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]stepping down from PTL

Hi Joe, It was a great experience working with you in Kingbird & Multisite I wish you all luck and all the best for the future goals. Thanks Goutham Pratapa. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:36 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Justin, > > Thank you for providing help and resources

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] reply: [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

Hi Trevor: Yes, I fully agree with you. How about the opinions from others? If no objection, I suggest to add one more hour for this dovetail meeting. Best regards hongbo From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: 2017年7月12日 4:11 To: Tianhongbo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]stepping down from PTL

Hi, Tianwei, Thank you Tianwwei very much, it's great journey for us to bring the VNF high availability across multiple cloud in OPNFV Beijing Summit. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: wutianwei Sent: 11 July 2017 19:11 To: joehuang Subject: 答复:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]stepping down from PTL

Hello, Justin, Thank you for providing help and resources to multi-site. Don't hesitate to talk to me and add me in the reviewer list if you want to integrate Tricircle. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Chigang (Justin) Sent: 11 July 2017 19:29 To:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Invitation: [ovn4nfv] project meeting @ Fri Jul 14, 2017 9am - 10am (PDT) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20170714T16Z DTEND:20170714T17Z DTSTAMP:20170711T232536Z ORGANIZER;CN=Vikram Dham:mailto:vikramd...@gmail.com UID:smjo4hqc2u3qs3ke08d65sl...@google.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

Hi Wenjing Yes its new thread. Re. EUAG I am aware of the Pain Points Wiki page however it's not clear to me how this is feeding initial scope of CVP. The CVP page https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11700688 does not have any feedback yet from what I can see ... any idea on

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 analysis

Hi Maryam, Thanks a million for your review! There are fairly clear actions for TST008 (which was approved, and has entered the maintenance mode with the rest of the Release 2 specifications, so we can propose changes). Following our discussion and agreements in the barometer meeting today, I'll

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] OPNFV doc workflow for E release

Hi Sofia, Can you provide a quick status on the documentation workflow for the E release. Is it same as D release or was that changed? I’m asking in the context of a new project which already has a lot of readthedoc-ready content and was wondering how to cutover to the OPNFV doc. Thanks

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [StorPerf] Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] reply: [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

Hi Hongbo I think we agreed that getting the CVP addendum in shape is top priority and it’s clear from comments received so far that we have some ways to go. I think it would help to spend time discussing the comments on a call and I am pretty sure this will take more than an hour. Can we

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

Hi Trevor I'm not sure if your email is a follow-up of a previous message or not. I couldn't find another email so I'm assuming this is a new thread. Let me know if I'm mistaken. First of all, we did receive detailed feedbacks from EUAG as far back as Feb and most recently during the Summit

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] Danube release status for TSC call July 11

Summary of scenarios that currently fail to deploy *Scenario* *Installer* *Released with D1/ D2* *Notes* os-nosdn-kvm-noha Apex yes os-odl_l2-sfc-noha Apex no withdrawn os-nosdn-fdio-noha Apex yes trozet says that fail is related to installer os-onos-nofeature-ha Apex no

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Danube SFC physical scenario deployment doubts

Hi Andres, I reply inline. Regards, Manuel On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 16:00 +0200, andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu wrote: > Manuel, > > Thank you for your proposal it has been very helpful, i have > already   > deployed the Openstack environment and it looks good, it passed the   > health

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Infra] [Testing) Stress/resiliency Testing evolution in OPNFV (draft)

Hi Infra group, I got an action point this afternoon during the TSC meeting after the presentation on the behalf of the testing working group on our vizion of test evolution (https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/9568526/testing%20evolution%20v1_3.pptx?version=2=1499788745000=v2) We

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Draft support for presentation to TSC

Hi Morgan, Coming back to this old thread after the TSC discussion today. My feeling is that the argument that we have to do stress testing on the N-1 release because the installers are not available early in the cycle is an argument for changing the release process (or converting it to a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for Danube 3.0 release

All, After checking with several scenarios owners during the Release call today, there was a consensus that people were ready to tag for the Danube 3.0 release on July 14th. There were some scenarios with degradation compared to 1.0 or 2.0 releases, but they would be explained in documentations

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

More inline From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:ahot...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 16:40 PM To: Jose Lausuch ; Fatih Degirmenci ; Beierl, Mark Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

+1 to "Can we work on a proposal and get every project that deals with containers involved?" It is mainly test projects who use containers so I again let testing community to take the lead and point you to where/how the conversation started. We can then try to generalize it later on. /Fatih

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

Hi Fatih, From: Fatih Degirmenci Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 2:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Beierl, Mark" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" ,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Agenda, · Danube 3.0 – Any issues or questions? · Clarify the responsibilities between the docs team and release manager · MS6 Preliminary documentation completed – Any clarification needed? Welcome, Sofia ___

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Inline… From: Jose Lausuch Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 4:27 AM To: Fatih Degirmenci , "Beierl, Mark" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org"

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Cross Community CI (XCI) Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] TST008 analysis

Hi Al I've gone through TST 008 and have a few questions: Q. Parameters to metrics, are these intended to be sent as part of the metric being reported, or can they be sent as information themselves, link status being the example I would pick on :) Q. Do we need to report both usage and

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [multisite]stepping down from PTL

Hi Joe, I was impressed by multisite Demo in OPNFV summit, that brings a high availability VNF solution across multiple cloud. Thanks your contribution for multisite. Regards Justin 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Zhipeng

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Hi, We excluded incremental tags because we overflooded our docker repos (I had to remove ~300 tags manually once in Functest docker repo). For projects that merge patches almost every day, that approach is unmaintainable. This is what we are currently following: latest: built from

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

HI Matthew, Thanks for your reply. Let's discuss it on that patch. Best regards, Zhihui Lijun (Matthew) 于2017年7月11日周二 下午4:29写道： > hi Zhihui > > there are some examples existed already, such as the compass ones. Since > you mentioned it will be a weekly job and the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

hi Zhihui there are some examples existed already, such as the compass ones. Since you mentioned it will be a weekly job and the pod name, as you know we run against Danube now to publish the Danube based release, so it should deploy Danube scenario. will put up a patch to add you to review,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

Hi dovetail team, I would like to create a dovetail CI weekly job on ZTE pod1. The scenario is os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha and the installer is fuel. I read jjb template files about dovetail in releng. It is hard to find out which jjb template file I should modify. Would you kindly please give me some

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] Danube release status for TSC call July 11

Hi David, thank you for this summary. However, I have a question about the scenarios failing to deploy now. Could you summarize, which of those scenarios were part of Danube 1.0 or 2.0? Our goal was to include 1.0 and 2.0 contents also in 3.0. What is your proposal? Cheers, Uli From:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Testing group weekly meeting

Hi reminder: this week => APAC meeting on Wednesday we keep however the Thursday slot for an adhoc meeting with Bitergia see agenda https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting /Morgan