Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] Meeting #41 - Aug 16, Wednesday : 14.00 UTC /7.00 PDT -Resolving OPNFV E/F release MANO steering issues

Sorry for the mail. I tried to add this to my calendar and it went this way. Please ignore this calendar invite. Get Outlook for iOS From: Trinath Somanchi Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 8:20:55 AM To:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] Meeting #41 - Aug 16, Wednesday : 14.00 UTC /7.00 PDT -Resolving OPNFV E/F release MANO steering issues

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:(UTC+05:30) Chennai\, Kolkata\, Mumbai\, New Delhi BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0530 TZOFFSETTO:+0530 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0530

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] [xci] Splitting out XCI to releng-xci repo

Hi All, With the TSC's approval of having extra project repositories[1], and given there hasn't been any objects to splitting out xci (this is still some discussion of other directories) I've gone ahead and populated the releng-xci[2] repo with the subtree of 'prototypes' from the releng

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] Meeting #41 - Aug 16, Wednesday : 14.00 UTC /7.00 PDT -Resolving OPNFV E/F release MANO steering issues

Hi all, Please join for mano-wg meeting in OPNFV coming Wednesday over GTM bridge and/or irc. Thanks Prakash Meeting Details Meeting Times: Every Wednesday (7.00 am PST) at 14.00 UTC, Other Ad-hoc meeting as per Project requests For IRC can use can use http://webchat.freenode.net/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also. · What timeframe are we planning this for? · How long would the trial be? · Bare Metal Pharos PODs only? (I think this is yes but want to confirm.) Best Regards, Dave Dave Urschatz Senior Technical Lead

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVN4NFV] Weekly Meeting - 5

Meeting minutes: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/ovn4nfv-meeting/2017/ovn4nfv-meeting.2017-08-11-16.00.html Best Regards, Trinath Somanchi | NXP | HSDC, INDIA From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Vikram

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :) On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) < bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote: > And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the > beta program of course! > > Thanks, > Bryan Sullivan | AT > > -Original Message- >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta program of course! Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT -Original Message- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' ; Christopher Price

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for the beta program. Here’s what I suggested: • We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta • We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are applicable the chance to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris, We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in alignment. I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta trial period, and get people signed up to participate in that process. In other groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Sounds like a good approach Lincoln. It would be nice to see how something like that fits into our current activities. Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment. / Chris From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Friday,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra-wg][pharos]about the PDF of community PODs

Dear POD owners, According to the discussion in the TSC in March and in the Plugfest meeting in Paris, in Euphrates release, all the PODs will provide PDF(Pod Description File) files in securedlab repo. The PDF will be consumed by the all the installers to deploy and will be used in the pharos

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris, What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following: 1. Freeze the development of new work 2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, submitting feedback / bugs 3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted. 4.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ONOSFW] Functest CI on ARM pods

Hi, as far as I understand, what you want is an onos scenario on ARM in CI. Functest tests are triggered according to the installer and the scenario today ONOS specific tests are defined as |case_name: onos project_name: functest criteria: 100 blocking: true description: >- Test Suite for the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ONOSFW] Functest CI on ARM pods

Hi , I was able to make ONOS controller up and run on ARM boards (AARCH64) with OpenStack as NBI also working on to run OPNFV Functest to validate basic ONOSFW use-cases [1] . After Successful porting , I'd like to enable daily ONOSFW Functest CI on ARM Pods as well . Could you share your

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Hongbo, Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki. I guess the questions I have relates more to: Once we have the tool in a ready state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available? I didn’t see

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris: Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+the+dovetail+tool Best regards hongbo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Guys, Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work? I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in flux, but we have other things to do as well. - Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with community scenario’s prior to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review ... /Trevor From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org