Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #45048] [linuxfoundation.org #45048] RE: [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

2017-08-30 Thread cedric.olliv...@orange.com via RT
g; tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #45048] [linuxfoundation.org #45048] RE: [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo Hi Cedric. I'm a bit confused. I thought Trevor took care of this. and checking I see all of your repos in the hub. Is there somethi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #45048] [linuxfoundation.org #45048] Re: [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

2017-08-30 Thread ahot...@cisco.com via RT
Few comments on this * To Fatih’s point (also developed in the thread [1]) and t repeat myself, we need to converge on the issue of container versioning first before deciding on which toolchain to use (internal Jenkins build or dockerhub build server). From what I can see dockerhub builds

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #45048] [linuxfoundation.org #45048] RE: [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

2017-08-30 Thread cedric.olliv...@orange.com via RT
Hello, To be precise, I setup automated builds via Docker to allow testing our Alpine containers during the development cycle via my public repository. I think they have been copied (badly partially for settings) for building the official images (opnfv/functest-xxx) which is not mandatory for us

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #45048] [linuxfoundation.org #45048] Re: [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

2017-08-30 Thread fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com via RT
Hi, About using docker hub for builds; I thought the docker builds would remain on OPNFV Jenkins due to the limitation you highlighted below and the other limitations/potential issues we summarized in earlier discussions. [1] I might have missed to followup discussions that have happened during