Hi Yujun,
That looks good. It’s a great idea to have diagrams and pictures editable so
that we can change it when we see the need.
Maybe we should apply the same for the other pictures/graphs.
Thanks,
Jose
From: test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]
On Behalf
cool
thanks Yujun
Le 15/12/2016 à 14:05, Yujun Zhang a écrit :
> Hi testers,
>
> I have replaced the previous image of TestPerf EcoSystem with an
> editable diagram in the overview section of testperf wiki page[1].
> Please review and amend if something is missing.
>
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/displ
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:20 PM Jose Lausuch
wrote:
> Hi Yujun,
>
>
>
> That looks good. It’s a great idea to have diagrams and pictures editable
> so that we can change it when we see the need.
>
Sure. Manage the images like code.
> Maybe we should apply the same for the other pictures/graphs.
Hi Yunjun,
Thanks for your work to make the TestPerf Ecosystem image editable. But I ‘m a
little confused with the rule of the TestPerf EcoSystem Diagram modification.
It seems that you have modified the TestPerf Ecosystem structure. I ‘m not
sure if it is a good way to modify the Ecosystem Di
Hi Kubi
Could you remind me record of the previous agreement? I may not be member
of QTIP project at that moment.
I made some correction on QTIP to make it closer to facts. Comments are
welcome.
Gaoliang (kubi) 于2016年12月15日 周四22:20写道：
> Hi Yunjun,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your work to make the TestPer
Replies inline
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:20 PM Gaoliang (kubi)
wrote:
> Hi Yunjun,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your work to make the TestPerf Ecosystem image editable. But I
> ‘m a little confused with the rule of the TestPerf EcoSystem Diagram
> modification.
>
> It seems that you have modified the Te
Hi Yujun,
Thanks for your timely reply!
First, it is a very praiseworthy effort of you on making the diagram editable!
What I concerned is the process of the modification of the Testperf Ecosystem
Diagram. As you know, Testperf Ecosystem Diagram is not only to show what the
one project will d
See my replies inline.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:43 PM Gaoliang (kubi)
wrote:
> Hi Yujun,
>
>
>
> it may delivers misleading information to the whole community.
>
This is exactly my motivation of the modification.
I hope we can find out the original agreement so we can know why it is
deliveri
Hi Yujun,
To my knowledge, the Draft Testperf Ecosystem Diagram was discussed and
published at the first plugfest. Its orientation is to avoid overlap works
between our testing projects and also to reflect the relations. Then after a
lot of discussion within the community which leads to common c
Thanks for the detail explanation. As many test-wg members are on holiday,
I think we may not able to arrive at a consensus on the process soon.
The modification is actually not affecting any other projects but yardstick
and QTIP. It reflects my understanding of QTIP projects, for the past and
als
I am glad we will discuss this in the Test Working Group meeting tomorrow … the
testing projects have evolved quite a bit since the first plugfest. We should
evolve wherever possible to normalize and avoid duplication BUT also give
projects autonomy they deserve to decide their interests and dri
I'm glad that we are pulling this discussion back to technical track.
Some additional comments about QTIP inline.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:09 AM Cooper, Trevor
wrote:
I am glad we will discuss this in the Test Working Group meeting tomorrow …
the testing projects have evolved quite a bit since
12 matches
Mail list logo
