Hi Med,
Looks good to me, and I think it covers all the possible options, which one
exception:
+--rw clat-ipv4-address?inet:ipv4-address
You may want to use a prefix, not an address. If you have a CLAT serving a
“big” network, instead of a small CE, you may need
Re-,
Forwarded to the OPSAWG list.
Please use this messages when replying.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> Envoyé : vendredi 18 août 2017 16:19
> À : 'Lee Howard'; jordi.pa...@consulintel.es
> Cc :
Dear all,
The -00 version integrates the comments received during the Call for Adoption:
- Clarify how Destination NAT is covered (Tianran)
- Follow the NMDA guidelines (Juergen and Qin)
- Include a generic structure for ALGs instead of listing supported ones
(Juergen)
- Include a discussion
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Network Address Translation
(NAT) and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)
Hello opsawg,
We are at the end of our call for adoption, and based on discussion on
this list, there seems to be enough support to adopt this work for the
opsawg. In addition to simple replies of support, this work is being
leveraged in other working groups. I would ask the authors to keep in
