> If the IETF as a community objected to the content of this draft,
> presumably there would ahve been significant dissent during the IETF
> last call.
my memory is that i commented once, supporting christian's eloquence
during ietf last call. i commented yesterday supporting ekr's
statement. fo
Let me ask a different version of Carlos (and maybe Randy's) point.
If the IETF as a community objected to the content of this draft,
presumably there would ahve been significant dissent during the IETF
last call.
It looked to me like the consensus in support of this was rough but clear.
More
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS
>>> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus
>>> of the IETF community.
>> That's an interesting claim.
>> If the process has not been followed, this r
On 08.02.18 21:53, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 2/8/18 5:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>> Without any judgement, this is an informational document, so it does
>> not necessarily need to have IETF consensus for publication.
> Generally I'm in favor of being pretty relaxed about informational
On 2/8/18 5:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
> Without any judgement, this is an informational document, so it does
> not necessarily need to have IETF consensus for publication.
Generally I'm in favor of being pretty relaxed about informational
documents that describe a real thing in the wor
IESG state changed:
New State: IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
(The previous state was IESG Evaluation)
Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/li
In order to compile the published YANG model with OpenDaylight Yangtools I
had to make the following change ( diff published file vs. changed file is
below ):
583c583
< path "../../../../../../acl/name";
---
> path "/access-lists/acl/name";
597c597
<
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel fr
Without any judgement, this is an informational document, so it does not
necessarily need to have IETF consensus for publication.
Mirja
> Am 08.02.2018 um 11:17 schrieb Randy Bush :
>
>>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS
>>> remains: I do not believe that this
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer t
Meral, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for your response. I have
entered an Abstain ballot on this document based on my own re-review.
Alissa
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Meral Shirazipour
> wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Tea
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://w
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS
>> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus
>> of the IETF community.
> That's an interesting claim.
> If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed
> to "believes".
> We should make
On 2/8/2018 6:04 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory
Hi EKR,
Regarding phishing:
> S 5.4.
(I think you mean S 5.3, but this equally applies to section 5.5, so...)
> It's pretty odd to talk about phishing without acknowledging that by
> far the largest anti-phishing platform (Safe Browsing) operates in the
> client, not be network interception
It's
16 matches
Mail list logo
