On 2/9/18 4:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul
Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.or
Al --
Response inline, some text elided.
On 2/9/18 11:21 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
§2.2.7:
A goal is protecting end-user
data -- b
Responses inline; some text elided.
On 2/9/18 8:22 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
---
§2.1.2 -- I am surprised that there is so much discussion of fields that are
not generally encrypted in practice (e.g., RTP headers, TCP
Hi Ben and Kathleen, on References:
...
...
> >>>
> >>> -12: Are there really no normative references? The definition of a
> >>> "normative
> >>> reference" is any reference needed to fully implement or _understand_ the
> >>> document. This is true for both informational and standards-track
> >>
Hi Ben,
Thanks for checking back through the responses. inline
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> Thanks for your response. Comments inline; I deleted sections that do not
> seem to need further discussion.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:18
Hi Kathleen,
Thanks for your response. Comments inline; I deleted sections that do not seem
to need further discussion.
Thanks!
Ben.
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks again for the comments, responses and proposals are inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb
- Original Message -
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 6:43 AM
> Hi Tom,
>
> I submitted a new revision of the draft which addresses your comments.
Thank you.
>
Med,
Yes, looks good,
Tom Petch
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : t.petch [mailto:ie...@btco