Re: [OPSAWG] TACACS+ information Draft Security Recommendations refactor

2018-07-15 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Hi Joe, Thanks Joe, all useful comments. I believe that most of them were caught in the previous upload (in which we responded to Alan’s last mail), I will make sure that any missing are in the next. On 16/07/2018, 0:20, "Joe Clarke" wrote: On 7/14/18 00:57, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote:

Re: [OPSAWG] TACACS+ information Draft Security Recommendations refactor

2018-07-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On 7/14/18 00:57, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > 9.5 Deployment Best Practices > > With respect to the observations about the security issues described above, a  > network administrator MUST NOT rely on the obfuscation of the TACACS+ > protocol and TACACS+ MUST be deployed over networks which

Re: [OPSAWG] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-li-opsawg-address-pool-management-arch-01

2018-07-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On 7/2/18 22:30, lichen@chinatelecom.cn wrote: > Hi all, >   > We have updated the new version of I-D, > draft-li-opsawg-address-pool-management-arch-01.txt, the revision was > made based on the comments raised in London meeting,  > Telecom Italia also provided a new use case afterwards, which