[OPSAWG] IETF 109 - CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS

2020-10-23 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Hello, WG. The final IETF 109 agenda has gone live: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/agenda.html https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/agenda.txt The opsawg session will be on Friday at 12:00 (UTC+7) or 05:00 UTC or 00:00 EST or Thursday at 21:00 PST (and so on). The session is 120

[OPSAWG] opsawg - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

2020-10-23 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Joe Clarke, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. opsawg Session 1 (2:00 requested) Friday, 20 November 2020, Session I 1200-1400 Room Name: Room 4 size: 504

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-09.txt

2020-10-23 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG Authors :

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-08.txt

2020-10-23 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG Authors :

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-02.txt

2020-10-23 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Tiru, Thanks. I sent you a PR (https://github.com/tireddy2/MUD-TLS-profile/pull/5/files) Cheers, Med De : tirumal reddy [mailto:kond...@gmail.com] Envoyé : vendredi 23 octobre 2020 14:26 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN Cc : Michael Richardson ; opsawg Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-02.txt

2020-10-23 Thread tirumal reddy
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 17:17, wrote: > Re-, > > > > Yes, I know. > > > > This is why I suggested it to be added on TLS-related specs. That’s > superior to the current approach in the draft. > I have updated the draft to discuss the rationale for adding a new registry, please see Section 5.3 in