From: OPSAWG on behalf of Tianran Zhou
Sent: 24 March 2021 06:23
Hi WG,
As discussed in the IETF110 meeting, we start a two weeks adoption call on
draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-07:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/
Please respond with your
Hi Med,
Thanks. Ack. Makes sense. I will include it in -08.
Best wishes
Thomas
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 1:46 PM
To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-TCZ-ZH1 ;
rwilton=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; zhoutian...@huawei.com; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Call for
I find this document useful and support its adoption.
Paolo
On 24/03/2021 07:23, Tianran Zhou wrote:
Hi WG,
As discussed in the IETF110 meeting, we start a two weeks adoption call
on draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-07:
I have read the document and support its adoption.
Regards,
Dev
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Tianran Zhou
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 2:23 AM
To: "opsawg@ietf.org"
Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption: draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-07
Hi WG,
As discussed in the
Dear OPSA WG chairs,
no, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to either of this drafts
draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common
draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
Best regards
Luis
--
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:33:18 +
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)"
To: "opsawg@ietf.org"
Re-,
Thanks, Thomas.
The description of 4 entry ("**Any label** associated with BGP") may suggest
that labels disseminated in BGP as per RFC8669 are also covered by that one.
You may include the clarification you provided below in your document to make
things less ambiguous.
Cheers,
Med
De
Hi all,
I support it as well.
As I expect that some usual suspects will raise a comment about IPv6, it is
better to fix this by mentioning mplsTopLabelIPv6Address in addition to 47
already cited in the document.
I also suggest to update the description in Section 3 to mention for each entry
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for your review comments.
I count your message as supportive in the adoption call.
:)
Cheers,
Tianran
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 3:36 PM
To: rwil...@cisco.com
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG]
I've read this document and support its adoption.
Given that this document is only 6 pages long (really only 2 pages of
substantial content) I hope that this document can move through the WG quickly.
Thanks,
Rob
From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: 24 March 2021 06:23
To:
Hi Rob,
During the OPSAWG meeting, you asked me about
draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-opsawg/
Rob: this registry allows anyone to add them.
Benoit: still worth publishing a doc to explain background. Benoit will
review.
Thomas:
Hi WG,
As discussed in the IETF110 meeting, we start a two weeks adoption call on
draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-07:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/
Please respond with your comments and thoughts on this draft.
We will conclude on April 7, 2021.
11 matches
Mail list logo
