A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : Discovering and Retrieving Software Transparency and
Vulnerability Information
Authors
Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening to all,
This update really has only two changes in it from the last time, and
should be ready for WGLC:
1. An attempt is made to format the Security Considerations section in
line with the requirements for YANG models. Thanks to Tom Petch
(
This draft responds to the various comments received to date. The big changes
are as follows:
1. It proposes the creation of a new registry, which will initially be
identical to the TLS 1.2 Hashing Algorithm Identifier Table but will be
separate so that we can add new rows as needed to support f
Hi,
I reviewed this draft at -01 [1]. The authors proposed acceptable
changes, and these have appeared in the subsequent revisions.
As part of WG last call, I have done another quick review. Asides
from a few trivial nits (below), I think this draft is ready for
publication.
Thanks,
Adrian
[1]
Hi Kenneth,
Thank you for the 01 draft. Here are a few review items.
Item 1:
The Description clause for the SnmpTLSFingerprint TEXTUAL-CONVENTION has the
word obsolete in quotes i.e., "obsolete" in line 185.
It is suggested that the quotes around the word obsolete be removed as it can
be confu
Reviewer: Christopher Wood
Review result: Not Ready
Reviewer: Christopher Wood
Review result: Has issues
General comments:
In general, the problem statement and motivation for this draft -- and the
techniques in Section 3 in particular -- seems underspecified. For example,
what are the requireme
Oops. I manually entered the review result in the datatracker form. The
intended review result is “Not Ready."
> On Mar 6, 2022, at 4:21 PM, Christopher Wood via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Christopher Wood
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> Reviewer: Christopher Wood
> Review result: Has
