Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs) to Proposed Standard BGP L2

2022-05-13 Thread tom petch
I find some lack of clarity with regard of the BGP Layer 2 Encapsulation Types module. I see no description of the module in the body of the document, only the module itself and the IANA Considerations (S.10.2). S.10.2 says ' add this note to both modules'. I only see one module. It gives t

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs) to Proposed Standard structure

2022-05-13 Thread tom petch
I find the overall structure of this I-D unhelpful. It contains four YANG modules, two 'normal' modules, protocol modules, complex and so likely to be updated sooner if not later. The other two YANG modules are the initial values of modules for IANA to maintain and so should never appear in a

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs) to Proposed Standard l2vpn-ntw

2022-05-13 Thread tom petch
Some stray thoughts on YANG module 'ietf-l2vpn-ntw' - In a number of places, the module says 'The default value is ... when used at the service level'. I have two problems with this. I see no 'default' specified in YANG - there could be but there is not; this would appear to be a recommendat

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs) to Proposed Standard BGP L2

2022-05-13 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Tom, Thank you for the comments. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : tom petch > Envoyé : vendredi 13 mai 2022 11:23 > À : last-c...@ietf.org > Cc : adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org > Objet : R

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs) to Proposed Standard l2vpn-ntw

2022-05-13 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Tom, Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : tom petch > Envoyé : vendredi 13 mai 2022 13:03 > À : last-c...@ietf.org > Cc : adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org > Objet : Re: Last Call: (A YANG > Network Da

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-16.txt

2022-05-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs Authors : Mohamed Boucadair

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap

2022-05-13 Thread Adrian Farrel
Very last minute review comments. Thanks for the work on this draft. I think the fundamentals here are useful and we are referencing this work from the TEAS network slicing work. I also see it being mentioned in the TEAS packet-optical integration applicability statement. Thanks, Adrian === Sec

[OPSAWG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-15

2022-05-13 Thread Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
Reviewer: Chris Lonvick Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors

[OPSAWG] [IANA #1230693] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm (xml-registry)

2022-05-13 Thread Sabrina Tanamal via RT
Hi Martin and Tim (cc: opsawg WG), As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm/ If these are OK, when the IESG approves the document for pub

Re: [OPSAWG] [IANA #1230693] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm (xml-registry)

2022-05-13 Thread Tim Bray
My favorite kind of XML directorate review, has no XML in it :) LGTM. On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:05 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT < drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote: > Hi Martin and Tim (cc: opsawg WG), > > As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the > propo