I find some lack of clarity with regard of the BGP Layer 2 Encapsulation
Types module.
I see no description of the module in the body of the document, only the
module itself and the IANA Considerations (S.10.2).
S.10.2 says ' add this note to both modules'. I only see one module.
It gives t
I find the overall structure of this I-D unhelpful.
It contains four YANG modules, two 'normal' modules, protocol modules,
complex and so likely to be updated sooner if not later.
The other two YANG modules are the initial values of modules for IANA to
maintain and so should never appear in a
Some stray thoughts on YANG module 'ietf-l2vpn-ntw'
- In a number of places, the module says 'The default value is ... when
used at the service level'. I have two problems with this. I see no
'default' specified in YANG - there could be but there is not; this
would appear to be a recommendat
Hi Tom,
Thank you for the comments.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : tom petch
> Envoyé : vendredi 13 mai 2022 11:23
> À : last-c...@ietf.org
> Cc : adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org
> Objet : R
Tom,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : tom petch
> Envoyé : vendredi 13 mai 2022 13:03
> À : last-c...@ietf.org
> Cc : adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l...@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: Last Call: (A YANG
> Network Da
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group
WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs
Authors : Mohamed Boucadair
Very last minute review comments.
Thanks for the work on this draft. I think the fundamentals here are useful
and we are referencing this work from the TEAS network slicing work. I also
see it being mentioned in the TEAS packet-optical integration applicability
statement.
Thanks,
Adrian
===
Sec
Reviewer: Chris Lonvick
Review result: Has Nits
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors
Hi Martin and Tim (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the
proposed registrations in draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm/
If these are OK, when the IESG approves the document for pub
My favorite kind of XML directorate review, has no XML in it :)
LGTM.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:05 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Hi Martin and Tim (cc: opsawg WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the
> propo
10 matches
Mail list logo