Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi -
On 2023-03-02 7:08 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
- Sect 4: Added the snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms node to represent the new
registry --- This is related to the issue that is still under review
On this point, I would like some guidance from other MIB experts. You
have created a “dummy”
Thanks Ken, LGTM.
//Zahed
From: Kenneth Vaughn
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 2:16 PM
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-upd...@ietf.org
; opsawg@ietf.org ;
opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No
- Sect 4: Added the snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms node to represent the new registry
--- This is related to the issue that is still under review
On this point, I would like some guidance from other MIB experts. You have
created a “dummy” node with no type to represent this. This doesn’t give
I have uploaded v13 of the TLSTM Update baed on Last Call comments. I believe
there is only one outstanding comment remaining, which is what should we use as
the identifier of the new registry. The current draft creates a new node for
this purpose but we are waiting on input from others to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area
Working Group WG of the IETF.
Title : Updates to the TLS Transport Model for SNMP
Author : Kenneth Vaughn
I have revised the text to read:
Renegotiation of sessions is not supported as it is not supported by TLS 1.3.
If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC should be updated
to indicate whether there are any additional requirements related to its use.
Regards,
Ken Vaughn
Thank you, Ken, for considering my review. I hope that it helps to improve (the
already good) quality of the I-D
Regards
-éric
From: Kenneth Vaughn
Date: Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 20:15
To: Eric Vyncke
Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-upd...@ietf.org"
, "opsawg@ietf.org" ,
Thanks for explanation.
In that section, the unsafe points of 0-RTT was called out and was enforces by
normative language. For the renegotiation it was not described that much,
whether it is a non- preferred feature for SNMP as a whole for whatever reason,
rather it is just that TLS1.3 does
