[OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update

This kicks off a two week WG LC on the update to “Finding and Using Geofeed Data”. This draft has received some initial comments and a rather extensive certificate review from Job. We’d appreciate some more eyes to look iover the changes to the original RFC9092 and focus comments there.

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-05.txt

Unfortunately, we’ve had crickets from the directorates. Since we have a shepherd, I think we’ll kickoff a WG LC and hopefully that will encourage more eyes. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Date: Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:54 To: Randy Bush , Ops Area WG Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:

[OPSAWG] New Liaison Statement, "LS on work progress on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) network in SG13 (as of November 2023)"

Title: LS on work progress on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) network in SG13 (as of November 2023) Submission Date: 2023-11-14 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1880/ From: Tatiana Kurakova To: Henk Birkholz ,Joe Clarke ,Tianran Zhou Cc: Robert Wilton ,Warren

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel/ ; IPFIX forwardingStatus

Thanks Benoit. That makes sense and is one of our use cases. On 14/11/2023, 13:57, "Benoit Claise" mailto:benoit.cla...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi John, On 11/13/2023 3:27 PM, Evans, John wrote: > Thanks Beniot for your feedback. > > Are you suggesting to update the IPFIX forwarding status

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel/ ; IPFIX forwardingStatus

Hi John, On 11/13/2023 3:27 PM, Evans, John wrote: Thanks Beniot for your feedback. Are you suggesting to update the IPFIX forwarding status codes to reflect the discard classes in draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel? Yes, I believe it would be the right way forward. I completely agree that

Re: [OPSAWG] ipfix-fwd-exceptions - Request WG adoption

Dear Chaitana, If finally read the draft. You mentioned: There is an existing IE 89 - forwardingStatus[IANA-IPFIX ]but it allows a very limited number of exceptions to be reported from the system (6-bit reason code) But at the same time, you

[OPSAWG] Compute metrics for service placement and selection

Thank you all for the productive conversations we had these past days on compute metrics exposure during the IETF 119 side meeting [1,2] as well as in CATS [2,3,4] and OPSAWG sessions [5]. The chairs of CATS and OPSAWG suggested that we write to the three mailing lists (including ALTO) to