All,
A new IETF draft on large flow load-balancing has been posted. We have very
good feedback so far from Shane Amante; your comments would be much appreciated.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
Thanks, ram
tworks may
lack end-to-end visibility.
Areas which need further discussion
Standards-based data model for exporting long-lived large flow information from
routers to a central management entity.
Your comments/feedback would be much appreciated.
Thanks, ramki
From: ramki Krishnan
Sent: Tuesday, Se
Hi Peng,
Thanks for the comments. Please find answers inline.
Thanks, ramki
From: He, Peng [mailto:p...@ciena.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:29 AM
To: ramki Krishnan; Scott Bradner; Chris Liljenstolpe; Melinda Shore;
opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: Sanjay Khanna
Subject: RE: new IETF draft
1:17 PM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc: Scott Bradner; Chris Liljenstolpe; Melinda Shore; Sanjay Khanna;
opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] new IETF draft - large flow load-balancing
Ramki,
Is there anything that needs to be standardized in order for someone to
implement this? It sounds like this is
Hi Fred,
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-firewalls-00.txt
- It is definitely worth mentioning behavioral analysis techniques like
sFlow/Netflow; a suggested place for this would be section 2.3.
- Deep packet inspection (DPI) in firewalls (e.g. signature a
HiMelinda,
Nov. 7th is a Wednesday, please confirm.
Thanks,ramki
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Melinda Shore
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:21 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] IETF 85 schedule
We're tentative
Hi Fred,
Thanks for the comments. Please find answers inline.
I will be uploading a new version shortly.
Thanks, ramki
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker (fred) [mailto:f...@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 9:37 PM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc: Scott O. Bradner; Chris
All,
Thanks for the comments so far. A new version of the draft has been posted.
Would be glad to receive more comments.
Thanks, ramki
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 4:00 PM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc
Hi Brian,
Thanks a lot for your comments. Please find answers to some of your comments.
We will respond to your other comments shortly.
> There may be some false positives due to multiple other flows
> masquerading as a large flow; the amount of false positives is
> reduced by parallel has
ancing bounded.
b.For satisfying the above goal, it is not worthwhile to load-balance
medium/small flows.
Thanks,
ram
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 12:06 AM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc: draft-krishnan-
large flow. The approximate
probability of this event is (.25)^m = (.25)^4 = .003
Thanks,
ramki
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:13 AM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc: draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load
Shore
Cc: ramki Krishnan;
draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balanc...@tools.ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:
draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-02.txt
On 16/01/2013 08:02, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 1/15/13 10:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
Hi Melinda,
We would like to present an updated version of the below draft. There has been
very good feedback from the Operators.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
Thanks,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsaw
Support this draft.
Thanks,
Ram (aka Ramki)
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Melinda Shore
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:16 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption,
draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load
Below are comments from Pete (as an individual) and responses below.
Agreed Pete - will do.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: Pete Moyer
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:08 PM
To: ramki Krishnan
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption,
draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-flow-load
Dear Zhen,
Thanks a lot for your comments. We will incorporate the appropriate changes in
the next version.
Thanks,
Ramki
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Cao,Zhen (cz)
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:15 PM
To: Melinda Shore
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subjec
Thanks Brian, agreed.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:35 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption,
draft-krishnan-opsawg-
) to reflect this
-- see below.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2063/
Thanks,
Ramki (on behalf of the co-authors)
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ramki Krishnan
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:40 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Dear All,
We have some updates to the draft which includes minimal changes in the
following areas
- Fixed incorrect section references
- Section 5.5 - more information on flow export
- Section 5.6 - additional techniques for gathering interface counters
Your
>> If this method is to be used on a router, one is
advised to make sure that the ICMP packets experience the same
forwarding and discarding courses as the service traffic (of
which the packet loss rate is to be measured) does, otherwise the
measurement will not make sense.
I wouldn’t quite ag
n...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ramki Krishnan
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2013 4:23 PM
To: Fan Peng; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-fan-opsawg-packet-loss-01.txt
>> If this method is to be used on a router, one is
advised to make sure that the IC
-
From: Fan, Peng [mailto:fanp...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 8:54 PM
To: ramki Krishnan; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-fan-opsawg-packet-loss-01.txt
Hi Ramki,
Thanks for commenting. Let me clarify your statement first. Are you
I support this as a co-author.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Melinda Shore
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 1:07 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mecha
Hi Pete,
Thanks a lot for your comments. We will address these.
Thanks,
Ramki
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of pete
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 10:35 AM
To: Melinda Shore
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG l
Hi Mukhtiar,
Thanks for your comments. Please find answers inline.
>>I think section 4.3.4. Automatic Hardware Recognition is a little vague. It
>>is not clear how and what is expected from the hardware to detect the large
>>flows. Is it sampling of packet forwarding counters in hardware or some
>> However, I don't think that the draft needs queue level information --
>> interface counters is sufficient. Or am I missing something?
Thanks Warren -- you said it right. For this draft, we need only interface
counters.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org
flaky links.
Thanks,
Ramki
From: Mukhtiar Shaikh
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:46 PM
To: ramki Krishnan; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP
Component Link Utilization in Networks"
Thanks Ramki.
Hi Wes,
Thanks for your comments. Please find responses below.
>> In order for this to be operationally manageable, especially in the case of
>> on-router processing of this rebalancing, there has to be an easy way for
>> the operator to access the information about what's happening - what the
Thanks Wes, please see inline.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: George, Wes [mailto:wesley.geo...@twcable.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:43 AM
To: ramki Krishnan; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP
Component
Dear Benoit,
The last call comments and your comments are addressed in the latest version of
the draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing/
Thanks,
Ramki
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
Sent: Thursday, December
i.net]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 11:48 AM
To: ramki Krishnan
Cc: Benoit Claise; draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balanc...@tools.ietf.org;
opsawg@ietf.org; Wesley George
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing: new version
needed to address the IETF LC comments
On Thu
, March 28, 2014 4:24 AM
To: Anoop Ghanwani
Cc: ramki Krishnan; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing (draft
response)
Hi Anoop, Ramki,
A gentle reminder.
Regards, Benoit
Hi Anoop,
Please post a new draft version, and I'll review the diffs.
Some
4 11:11 AM
To: Benoit Claise
Cc: ramki Krishnan; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing (draft
response)
Thanks Benoit. We'll figure out how to account for this in the draft and will
have the update posted in the next few days.
Anoop
On We
Hi Scott,
We will certainly do.
Thanks,
Ramki
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bradner, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:38 PM
To: draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing@tools.ietf.org
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] ID st
34 matches
Mail list logo
