Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-07 Thread mohamed.boucadair
De : Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 7 septembre 2021 23:35 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : Jeffrey Haas ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG Objet : Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm Hi Med, thank you for your

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-07 Thread Greg Mirsky
Med > > > > *De :* Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mercredi 1 septembre 2021 15:25 > *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > *Cc :* Jeffrey Haas ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; > opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG > *Objet :* Re: A question on OAM section i

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-03 Thread mohamed.boucadair
[mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 1 septembre 2021 15:25 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : Jeffrey Haas ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG Objet : Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm Hi Med, thank you for your thoughtful consideration

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread tom petch
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Jeffrey Haas Sent: 01 September 2021 16:09 Med, On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:21:03PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > The IETF LC was actually closed since 2021-08-06. > > Even if the IETF LC is closed, the current BFD comments will be part of the >

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Med, On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:21:03PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > The IETF LC was actually closed since 2021-08-06. > > Even if the IETF LC is closed, the current BFD comments will be part of the > comments we will be addressing in the next iteration. For your record, we >

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread Greg Mirsky
Cheers, > Med > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jh...@pfrc.org] > > Envoyé : mercredi 1 septembre 2021 14:38 > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > > Cc : Greg Mirsky ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm- > > l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Mirsky ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm- > l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG b...@ietf.org> > Objet : Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm > > Med, > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:48:43AM +, > mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Jeff, >

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Med, On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:48:43AM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Actually, except local-multiplier that we call detection-multiplier, the > same names are used in both drafts. We can fix that one. Certainly a start. > Please note that we are not using the

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-09-01 Thread mohamed.boucadair
> -Message d'origine- > De : Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jh...@pfrc.org] > Envoyé : mardi 31 août 2021 23:31 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > Cc : Greg Mirsky ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm- > l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG b...@ietf.org> > Objet : Re: A question on OAM section in dra

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-31 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Med, On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:19:23PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thank you for checking the OAM part and for sharing this comment. > > As you can read in both sections 4 and 5, this model is ** not a device > configuration model **. The focus is on aspects that

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-31 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Greg, Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 30 août 2021 15:48 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; rtg-bfd WG Objet : Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm Hi

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-30 Thread Greg Mirsky
Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* samedi 28 août 2021 04:56 > *À :* draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg ; > rtg-bfd WG > *Objet :* A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm > > >

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-30 Thread mohamed.boucadair
on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm Dear Authors, thank you for your work on this document. I've read the draft and have a question, and a suggestion. Section 7.6.4<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm#section-7.6.4> describes how BFD is controlled

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-28 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Tom, I understand that the missref that the BFD YANG data model got into for so long caused some frustration and uncertainty. As of late, the authors, WG Chairs and the AD have taken actions to untangle the situation and progress most of the data models leaving a smaller part in missreff. I

Re: [OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-28 Thread tom petch
From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of Greg Mirsky Sent: 28 August 2021 03:56 Dear Authors, thank you for your work on this document. I've read the draft and have a question, and a suggestion. Section 7.6.4 describes how

[OPSAWG] A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

2021-08-27 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear Authors, thank you for your work on this document. I've read the draft and have a question, and a suggestion. Section 7.6.4 describes how BFD is controlled in vpn-common. I've noticed that you use references to