Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks for checking back through the responses. inline On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Hi Kathleen, > > Thanks for your response. Comments inline; I deleted sections that do not > seem to need further discussion. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > >> On

Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Kathleen, Thanks for your response. Comments inline; I deleted sections that do not seem to need further discussion. Thanks! Ben. > On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > Thanks again for the comments, responses and

Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks again for the comments, responses and proposals are inline. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: > > -2.2.1: Please expand "QUIC" and add a citation. > > QUIC started out as an acronym (and went through two or three variations), > but sometime during the chartering process, the expansion was

Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Following up on an obscure point ... On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >

Re: [OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks for the detailed comments. We will fold them into a revision after the telechat (as I have no time before). We have some editorial ones from Ben that will be folded in as well. We were hesitant to change anything that was not requested as we didn't want to leave the document in

[OPSAWG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to