From: OPSAWG on behalf of Thomas Fossati
Sent: 17 October 2022 11:10
Hi, all,
I was asked to bring to the list one comment from my shepherd write-up
[1]; specifically, that draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls hasn't been reviewed
by the YANG Doctors (yet).
There seems to be an expectation [2] that the
Hi Med,
On 17/10/2022, 12:01, wrote:
> I don’t see why this draft should be an exception.
Thanks for confirming.
> BTW in addition to the yang doctors review, I suggest to also request
> an early secdir review. Thanks.
I agree and suggested the same in the write-up.
cheers, t
--
IMPORTANT
-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls YANG Doctor review
Hi, all,
I was asked to bring to the list one comment from my shepherd write-up
[1]; specifically, that draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls hasn't been reviewed
by the YANG Doctors (yet).
There seems to be an expectation [2] that the YANG Doctor review is
completed
Hi, all,
I was asked to bring to the list one comment from my shepherd write-up
[1]; specifically, that draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls hasn't been reviewed
by the YANG Doctors (yet).
There seems to be an expectation [2] that the YANG Doctor review is
completed before or during WGLC.
I am not sure
