Hi Jen, thank you to recognize I am just trying to be a good citizen here and
to learn and understand.
And I did learn a few things in this email thread (tx Tom (1))
Irt “For example, I'm absolutely incapable of typing and listening at the same
time... »
I agree, and I wish I could have the
Hi Arnaud,
First of all, thank you for reading the minutes and providing
corrections and feedback ;)
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 1:58 AM Arnaud Taddei wrote:
> As I am still learning the IETF, I am a bit surprised. If ‘minutes’ mean ‘a
> script of what was said on the mic’ then this is ok. But as
From: Arnaud Taddei
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2023 14:25
Hmm, ok just to keep my comment in the box it was intended.
I am learning the IETF so thank you for the feedback. My point was super down
on earth and selfish.
Like many my time is limited. When I receive a ‘minute’, in order to
Hmm, ok just to keep my comment in the box it was intended.
I am learning the IETF so thank you for the feedback. My point was super down
on earth and selfish.
Like many my time is limited. When I receive a ‘minute’, in order to save time,
I like to short cut a long read to reach out to the
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:35:10AM +, tom petch wrote:
> The Chairs may judge that support from six implementers weighs more
> than opposition from ten operators:-) Such is the IETF.
Not sure if this was meant as a random example of why judging consensus
can be complicated at times -
From: OPSEC on behalf of Arnaud Taddei
Sent: 08 August 2023 09:58
Thank you Jen,
Quick comments from a train in Germany
1. As I am still learning the IETF, I am a bit surprised. If ‘minutes’ mean
‘a script of what was said on the mic’ then this is ok. But as chair in another
world, I
