-
> From: OPSEC On Behalf Of IETF Meeting Session
> Request Tool
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 10:17 PM
> To: session-requ...@ietf.org
> Cc: war...@kumari.net; opsec-cha...@ietf.org; opsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSEC] opsec - Not having a session at IETF 119
>
>
>
>
Hello,
As we haven't received any agenda requests, the OpSec WG is not going
to meet at IETF118.
Please consider suggesting topics for IETF119 in the meantime ;)
---
Jen and Ron
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
:
- the title of the presentation,
- file name of the draft, the speaker's name (and email)
- how much time you would like.
Please send your proposed agenda items to the chairs by Oct 24, 23:59 UTC
Note, the draft cut-off date for all Internet-Drafts is Oct 23, 23:59 UTC
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
model, maybe [Fernando] look at that if that
> is "adding water to your mill »
Done. PTAL and let me know if any changes are needed.
> From: OPSEC on behalf of Jen Linkova
>
> Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2023 at 10:36
> To: opsec WG
> Cc: OpSec Chairs
> Subject: [OPSEC] OpS
Hello,
The meeting minutes from the IETF117 OpSec session have been published:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/minutes-117-opsec-202307272230
Many thanks to Henk for taking them!
If you said smth during the session pls check the minutes and ensure
that your comment was
Hello,
OpSec session is scheduled for 15:30 - 16:30 localtime on Thursday, July 27th.
The chairs are now planning the agenda.
If you have a draft you would like to discuss, please send your
request for agenda time to the opsec chairs.
Please include the following information in the request:
-
Jen Linkova has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution-04
as Informational on behalf of the OPSEC working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution
has complained yet.
So we need to make a use case for EH, make it attractive enough and
make the failure mode unpleasant enough for users to complain.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
Dear authors,
Could you please confirm if you are aware of any IPR claims related to
draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution?
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
minutes!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
This email starts the OpSec WG adoption call for
draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-addressing/.
The call ends on Thu, Apr 13th, 23:59:59 UTC.
Please review the draft and send your comments to the list.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
Hello,
After some delay (as we were waiting for more review), the WGLC has
been concluded.
I believe we shall expect an updated version (to address Fernando's
comments) - as soon as it's submitted, we'll advance the draft.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:17 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
>
>
Hello,
The agenda for OpSec WG meeting @ IETF116 has been published:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/agenda-116-opsec
See you in Yokohama!
--
Jen and Ron
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
re: the support or a lack of thereof is
appreciated)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:17 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution/).
>
> The WGLC ends
IANA Consideration:
"additional values" - I assume it shouldn't be a list item but a part
of the previous sentence, right?
---
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:17 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution
> (https://d
Hello,
This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-probe-attribution/).
The WGLC ends on Sun, Jan 29th, 23:59:59UTC.
Please review the draft and send comments/suggestions/opinions to the list.
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen
Jen Linkova has requested publication of
draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-02 as None on behalf of the OPSEC
working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise
The adoption call has finished and the chairs believe the group is in
favour of adopting the draft.
The authors - please re-submit as a WG document.
Thank you!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:37 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
>
> This email starts the adoption call for draft-vyncke-opsec-probe-attri
The WG Last Call has finished. The chairs believe the group in favour
of advancing the document.
The authors - do you have plans to address Chris's comments? Shall we
expect the new revision?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:32 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
>
> This email starts a WG Last Call for draf
stating their support (or concerns regarding)
advancing the draft.
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
If you made any comments during the OpSec session at IETF114, please
review the meeting minutes:
https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-opsec?view and make sure your
comments were captured correctly.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry on behalf of the OpSec chairs
Hello.
We need a volunteer to take meeting minutes for the OpSec session. If
you are planning to attend and could help, please let me know.
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
Hello,
The agenda for OpSec session @IETF114 has been published:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/materials/agenda-114-opsec
If you requested a slot and do not see your document on the agenda,
please let the chairs know ASAP.
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
enda item, I'll request a short slot.
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSEC on behalf of Jen Linkova
>
> Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 04:13
> To: opsec WG
> Cc: OpSec Chairs
> Subject: [OPSEC] Anything to discuss at IETF114?
Hello,
So far we do not have any agenda for the OpSec meeting at IETF114.
If you have an agenda item, please let the chairs know before June 5th
so we can request a session before the deadline. Otherwise the group
wouldn't meet in Philadelphia.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
with your comments.
Please state if you support (or don't support) the adoption.
Also, if you are willing to contribute to the document, please include
it in your response.
Thank you!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf
- especially at your
first meeting!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
to thank both OpSec and TLS working groups for
reviewing the document.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry on behalf of the OpSec WG chairs.
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
the document describes.
Overall, we think these issues need to be addressed before the working
group can consider adopting this document.
Thanks to everyone who has reviewed the document and provided the feedback.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing
ble outcome of people not paying enough attention.
But thanks for the comments, I'll take it into account - let's
consider it my learning curve..
BTW -02 has been posted so I hope your comments have been incorporated.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
ppear around the time of an IETF meeting, a timing that I sometimes
> think is designed to let it slip through unnoticed. Given all those other
> I-D - silly authors - it may be more than three weeks before I get my
> thoughts together.
Just to clarify: would you prefer not to have
.
Please review the document and express your support or concerns/comments.
Thanks!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry on behalf of the OpSec Chairs.
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
__
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
at this time.
Regards,
Rob (and Warren)
---
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> ___
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
eeds to be used for the RFC 3797 selection
process, within the next few weeks.
Thank you!
Barbara Stark
bs7652 at att dot com
nomcom-chair-2020 at ietf dot org
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
Hello,
This message starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-19
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-19)
Please review the draft respond to this email to support the document
and/or send comments by 23:59 UTC on Fri, Oct 11th 2019.
Thanks!
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
38 matches
Mail list logo
